• NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Weird title. Why say woman’s son?

      Because it is more captivating when it starts with that good old stereotype:

      “Man saves woman”

    • FiveMacs@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Because she isn’t the topic of the story, and it’s not the strangers son…

      Are you offended because someone said woman ?

      If anything, the article should have named Andrew Podolak way before half the article was done because was the one who did something and the only point of the story.

  • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    This is great and all, but why are 4 year olds in danger of getting hit by flying pucks in the first place? Shouldn’t the barriers be tall enough to prevent this?

    This story doesn’t exactly fit the orphan-crushing-machine criteria, but it has a similar vibe…

  • KoboldCoterie
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    “If you didn’t see it, here’s slo-mo…”

    Yep, still can’t see it.