return2ozma@lemmy.world to A Boring Dystopia@lemmy.world · 5 months agoGet rid of landlords...lemmy.worldimagemessage-square457fedilinkarrow-up11.33Karrow-down1304cross-posted to: leftymemes@lemmy.dbzer0.compoliticalmemes@lemmy.world
arrow-up11.02Karrow-down1imageGet rid of landlords...lemmy.worldreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to A Boring Dystopia@lemmy.world · 5 months agomessage-square457fedilinkcross-posted to: leftymemes@lemmy.dbzer0.compoliticalmemes@lemmy.world
minus-squareFrowingFostek@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down5·5 months agoWhy does this feel you’re purity testing people on Lemmy? Lol
minus-squareClent@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down2·5 months agoThere is no gray line. People who exploit others via landlording only vary in how much property they own. There is no nuance. One either does or does not lord over land. Every landlord justifies their participation in their own way. No one is born a landlord. It’s a choice. No one is born a landlord sympathizer. It’s a choice. Being an ally requires one avoid specific choices. At any time one can sell their property and become an ally. Those claiming their situation is an exception are the ones arguing for purity.
Why does this feel you’re purity testing people on Lemmy? Lol
There is no gray line. People who exploit others via landlording only vary in how much property they own.
There is no nuance. One either does or does not lord over land. Every landlord justifies their participation in their own way.
No one is born a landlord. It’s a choice.
No one is born a landlord sympathizer. It’s a choice.
Being an ally requires one avoid specific choices. At any time one can sell their property and become an ally.
Those claiming their situation is an exception are the ones arguing for purity.