• foggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    7 months ago

    Dude something fucking wild is brewing in cyber warfare. I can feel it in my news feed.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      April has been wild so far, like 4 high profile vulnerabilities:

      • xz - mostly impacted ssh
      • Windows batch files
      • php via glibc
      • GitHub malware hosting

      And now this. I’m probably missing some as well.

      • Lumilias
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yep, you forgot Palo Alto’s GlobalProtect telemetry allowing for remote code execution. A perfect 10.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    7 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Hackers backed by a powerful nation-state have been exploiting two zero-day vulnerabilities in Cisco firewalls in a five-month-long campaign that breaks into government networks around the world, researchers reported Wednesday.

    These devices are ideal targets because they sit at the edge of a network, provide a direct pipeline to its most sensitive resources, and interact with virtually all incoming communications.

    Those characteristics, combined with a small cast of selected targets all in government, have led Talos to assess that the attacks are the work of government-backed hackers motivated by espionage objectives.

    “Our attribution assessment is based on the victimology, the significant level of tradecraft employed in terms of capability development and anti-forensic measures, and the identification and subsequent chaining together of 0-day vulnerabilities,” Talos researchers wrote.

    “Regardless of your network equipment provider, now is the time to ensure that the devices are properly patched, logging to a central, secure location, and configured to have strong, multi-factor authentication (MFA),” the researchers wrote.

    It stems from improper validation of files when they’re read from the flash memory of a vulnerable device and allows for remote code execution with root system privileges when exploited.


    The original article contains 533 words, the summary contains 191 words. Saved 64%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • IHawkMike@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    ASAs are still way more prevalent than they should be when Palo Alto and others are much better options. Still, I’m glad I barely have to deal with them any more.