Columbia University and other schools have taken steps to try to address students' concerns over safety and freedom of expression. Follow for live news updates.
“No valid point” AKA a demonstrated point you just don’t like. You’re good at justifying chickening out and running away, I can tell you’ve had practice.
See a few comments back, where you couldn’t respond to “anecdotal evidence is crap and you can’t support your assertion” so you just deflected with some tangentially related bullshit? And where you called someone a coward for doing exactly what you’re doing, avoiding addressing clearly made critical points?
By your own criteria, you’re a coward. You complain about name calling, yet engage in it yourself when it’s convenient. You’re a hypocrite and a coward, by your own admission, and I’m calling you out because you’re shitting up the place by being what the other poster aptly noted as the quintessential “my point is whatever makes me right at this moment, even if I’ll contradict my stance immediately afterward to be right somewhere else” type of poster. You actively make this a worse place to be.
That’s the point. Looking forward to see how you deflect this.
You need to read the whole thing to put it in context. You have no idea what my criteria is. I haven’t called you a name, though the same can’t be said of you. You bring nothing new, but might as well be the same person. Try something original. Make a point. Don’t repeat ad nauseum. I know you can do it.
I figured you’d just lie and deflect some more. Generally, when multiple people tell me the same thing, I at least consider that there might be some merit to their statements. That’s definitely not how you operate, though. Somehow, you think it’s because they’re not being original enough. I haven’t seen mental gymnastics like this since the last time I was on Reddit. You’ve taken some weapons grade copium. At least this was all good for a laugh.
Big “fingers in my ears nah nah nah I can’t hear you” toddler energy here. A coward indeed.
So, another one with no valid point.
“No valid point” AKA a demonstrated point you just don’t like. You’re good at justifying chickening out and running away, I can tell you’ve had practice.
Nobody is running from someone like you. But, you don’t have a pointt other than? Nothing to respond to.
Classic boomer cope: lie and deflect, deflect and lie.
Deflect from what? You still have no point. You simply call names and have no substance. Very shallow.
See a few comments back, where you couldn’t respond to “anecdotal evidence is crap and you can’t support your assertion” so you just deflected with some tangentially related bullshit? And where you called someone a coward for doing exactly what you’re doing, avoiding addressing clearly made critical points?
By your own criteria, you’re a coward. You complain about name calling, yet engage in it yourself when it’s convenient. You’re a hypocrite and a coward, by your own admission, and I’m calling you out because you’re shitting up the place by being what the other poster aptly noted as the quintessential “my point is whatever makes me right at this moment, even if I’ll contradict my stance immediately afterward to be right somewhere else” type of poster. You actively make this a worse place to be.
That’s the point. Looking forward to see how you deflect this.
You need to read the whole thing to put it in context. You have no idea what my criteria is. I haven’t called you a name, though the same can’t be said of you. You bring nothing new, but might as well be the same person. Try something original. Make a point. Don’t repeat ad nauseum. I know you can do it.
Can you?
I figured you’d just lie and deflect some more. Generally, when multiple people tell me the same thing, I at least consider that there might be some merit to their statements. That’s definitely not how you operate, though. Somehow, you think it’s because they’re not being original enough. I haven’t seen mental gymnastics like this since the last time I was on Reddit. You’ve taken some weapons grade copium. At least this was all good for a laugh.