lemmyreader@lemmy.ml to Technology@lemmy.mlEnglish · 7 months agoPasskeys: A Shattered Dreamfy.blackhats.net.auexternal-linkmessage-square51fedilinkarrow-up193arrow-down112cross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanstechnology@lemmy.worldsecurity@lemmy.ml
arrow-up181arrow-down1external-linkPasskeys: A Shattered Dreamfy.blackhats.net.aulemmyreader@lemmy.ml to Technology@lemmy.mlEnglish · 7 months agomessage-square51fedilinkcross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanstechnology@lemmy.worldsecurity@lemmy.ml
minus-squarekevincox@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up2·7 months ago But… PAKE is used as a method for ongoing exchange of messages I don’t know what you mean. In really don’t see it that complex, in my last job IT installed a passkey in my laptop They can also install a randomly generated password just as easily. Sending passwords is insecure because if an attacker gets the password, you lost That is why you use a PAKE, you don’t send the password. Old people won’t adopt it unless forced They also won’t adopt passkeys unless forced. What is the difference?
I don’t know what you mean.
They can also install a randomly generated password just as easily.
That is why you use a PAKE, you don’t send the password.
They also won’t adopt passkeys unless forced. What is the difference?