• cryptiod137@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    6 months ago

    It’s not a cost overrun, the scope of the project got expanded to include carrier operations.

    Look up FUTA docking to see the cost breakdown

    • chetradley@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      The carrier operations are shared jointly between several NATO countries, and would mostly be covered under the Yearly International Freedom Fund (YIFF).

      • cryptiod137@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        6 months ago

        That makes sense, but will that also cover the Vertically Oriented Reconnaissance Equipment (VORE) package as well?

        • Azuth@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          6 months ago

          Indeed, it’s necessary in order to sync its Direct Intervention Combustible Kinetics via the Tactical Information Transmission System.

          If you ask me, it’s this combo of DICK and TITS that really makes FUTA special.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Look at that thing. It has so much stuff on it. VTOL, normal flight, antennas, and who knows what else to be strapped on it. Does everything, but none of it well. Well, except make some defense contractor a shitton of money.

    • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      That’s the aerosonde and it’s actually a sick piece of tech. They’re competing for the tactical UAS contract right now, and VTOL is a requirement, so bolt-on packages for existing platforms are kind of an easy out. Also it’s a recon platform so fly and do camera are really the only things it has to do well.