‘If passed by the Senate and signed into law, the bill would broaden the legal definition of antisemitism to include the “targeting of the state of Israel, conceived as a Jewish collectivity.’"

Pardon me, but what is this horseshit?

  • aleph@lemm.eeOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    84
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    For those who aren’t aware, this bill aims to effectively enshrine into law the IHRA definition of antisemitism, which has been a controversial doctrine since its inception because critics say it unnecessarily curtails freedom of speech.

    Hell, even the Zionist Anti-Defamation League say on their website that the IHRA definition is a guideline that should not be codified into law because it could be used to infringe the First Amendment:

    ADL does not support the adoption and application of the IHRA Definition in a manner that would create new categories of legally prohibited speech that are subjected to either civil or criminal penalties – something we believe the First Amendment and principles of free speech would prevent.

    This bill does very little that existing legislation does not already except have a chilling effect on freedom of speech on university campuses, and the fact that it got such widespread support from both Democrats and Republicans in the House is an absolute farce.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s a terrible bill, but I feel fairly confident that this will not get through the Senate, so I’m not all that concerned about it. It’s performative at best.

  • MrFappy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    A law like this is going to have the opposite of the “intended” effect. It’s going to make people hate Jewish folk as a whole. Imagine being part of the genocidal protected class, feeling untouchable, you’re going to push those boundaries more and more until you’re universally detested.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      60
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      That’s the goal of the Zionists. They want to make sure Israel is the only safe haven, because they don’t believe in multicultural societies like the US. Everything has to be an ethnostate. That’s why they always make deals with right wing and outright antisemetic regimes like Hungary, apartheid South Africa and Saudi Arabia.

      • MrFappy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        65
        ·
        8 months ago

        Jesus Christ, does this mean that a certain toothbrush mustachioed “camp counselor” was onto something? The thought sickens me, but things are starting to get a bit too muddied to be sure anymore.

            • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              8 months ago

              The German army had to run on something… and late into the war that something certainly wasn’t food.

              • maynarkh@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                8 months ago

                Late? Early in the war, what do you think the Blitzkrieg ran on? Pervitin and Panzerschokolade, that’s what.

                Not like the Western Allies were far behind, apparently their drug of choice was Benzedrine in their “go pills”.

          • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            8 months ago

            This is the only correct response. You can make comparisons to Hitler all you want but you better be damn sure you have an actual point or you’re in Nazi territory

        • jonne@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          8 months ago

          No, why would you get that from my post? What he did consider, however, before settling on the ‘final solution’, was deporting all the Jews, but nobody would take them.

          • This is fine🔥🐶☕🔥@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            What he did consider, however, before settling on the ‘final solution’, was deporting all the Jews, but nobody would take them.

            So there’s probably an alternate timeline where Hitler created Israel to deport all the Jews‽

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          No, he loved the idea of shipping Jewish folks away. The real solution is to live peacefully with Jewish folks welcome in your communities. The way to stop those who will make ethnostates is to reject the concept of ethnostates

  • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    So, it must now also be bigotry to condemn China’s government for being… uh fucking evil. Or russia’s. North Koreas. or anybody else we don’t happen to like.

    • AlligatorBlizzard@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      The tankies occasionally use the term sinophobia, it was my understanding that the term meant “bigotry by condemning China’s government for being fucking evil”.

      • Lileath@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        At the danger of sounding like a tankie, have you looked at politics subs on reddit ir even just the average headline when China does anything at all? I’ve regularly seen people advocating for nuclear strikes against chinese metropolises because “If the Chinese were against their government they would have already rebelled, so they are complicit in everything their leaders do” and the articles that go like “China Has Found A Cure To Cancer; But At what cost?” (slightly exaggerated but probably something we would see if a cure to cancer really was invented in China)

        • AlligatorBlizzard@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          While I’ve never seen that on reddit (I wasn’t very active in global politics subs on there), I completely believe there’s people saying that sort of thing. And I apologize for making a comment that kinda denies that kind of bias exists -it wasn’t my intention but it definitely happened.

          Lemmy is my first time encountering the term and, well, we’ve got a few apologists for the Chinese government around.

      • BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        This is happening in the House that is controlled by Republicans. Unfortunately a lot of Democrats voted for it too, but the only meaningful opposition also came from Dems. So Dems are split while Rs are all in on the genocide.

          • BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            8 months ago

            95 Dems voted yes. 92 voted “present,” 13 voted “nay,” and 13 did not vote.

            Republicans - who again control the chamber - voted 216-1 in favor.

            I stand by the accuracy of my comment.

            • Woozythebear@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              8 months ago

              Yeah so like I said there are only like 15 against it. If all Republicans in the senate vote for it there only needs to be like 10 dems to say yes for it to pass and if we look at percentages it becomes clear this bill easily has enough votes and Biden will 100% sign it.

              You thinking it won’t is just cope.

        • pantyhosewimp@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          It irks me also that the vocabulary-lazy folks account for 85% of the population because they constantly steal words from us that have specific narrow meanings. My advice, to help aid in our mental health, is to assume that every use of “fascism” really means “authoritarianism”.

  • Breezy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    If biden signs something like this i really see trump winning come November. There shouldnt be massive amounts of protest decrying a genocide and to have our president just look at everyone like they’re the crazy ones for saying no to slaughtering a whole set of people. What benefit does america gain for defending Israel. Do they even do anything expect awfull shit. Like do they produce anything other than hate.

  • MalachaiConstant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    8 months ago

    A funny thing happens to a word when you give it additional definitions: the original definition loses meaning.

    Great news for traditional antisemites

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    8 months ago

    So Israeli government propaganda is about to get turned into US law? So calling a criminal apartheid government as such is suddenly illegal…