• Stern@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Gotta imagine they were expecting pushback, but probably nowhere near the level we’re seeing, so it makes sense to backtrack.

    • all-knight-party@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      48
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I hope that Sony allows some levity here, the game already can function without linking, as it has been. it would be, development-wise, trivial to reverse it, nothing in the game actually relies upon it.

      Sony just has to bite the bullet and do the right thing.

      • SGG@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        I think the way they had planned on banning players for cheating and potentially unwanted behaviour was through PSN. People are also fairly sure it is a requirement in the contract with Sony that PSN accounts are required. It’s just due to server issues from popularity they removed the requirement.

        So while it’s possible from a technical standpoint, there’s some non technical hurdles to overcome as well.

        • all-knight-party@kbin.run
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          6 months ago

          True, they would need to do the work needed to pivot to VAC, so it isn’t nothing. We’ll have to see how it shakes out.

        • Zoot@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          See the only part I don’t get is, if it was truly mandatory from the get go, why did they sell it in regions not supported by PSN?

          • SGG@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 months ago

            From what I have seen, Sony seems to mostly turn a blind eye to people from unsupported regions simply selecting a supported region.

            However it is stupid to have made the game available for sale in those unsupported regions, I agree.

            I think that it began as a “gentlemen’s agreement” of sorts, but now that the game is SUPER POPULAR Sony wants all that juicy PII and that bump in active PSN accounts to appease shareholders.

            • Zoot@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              6 months ago

              All of that sounds so insanely illegal. Selling a game that by all intents and purposes, doesn’t work in your region.

              • Goldmage263@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 months ago

                Yeah, but the legal system lags way behind on tech and data. It lags harder that the original Ubisoft potato servers.

          • OsaErisXero@kbin.run
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 months ago

            Nah, a standard corpo MBA would have rolled out the apology wall by now and reverted the change.

            The only way I see this getting better is if Arrowhead sues Sony for intentionally killing the game on PC.

            • Zoot@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              Not sure if that last bit is meant as a joke, and while id love to see anything like that happen… I don’t think they would stand a chance saying that, considering AH most likely new from the get go that PSN was not going to be optional, and should not have hidden that info away.

              Also, what the fuck is up with them selling the game in other countries, if it truly was “mandatory from the get go” thats the part I just don’t get.

      • inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        6 months ago

        Yup, I don’t think it would be that difficult to have the unique steam id being logged as part of the application, just requires a bit of coordination and cooperation with steam.

        This isn’t a unique or one off thing other games have done this I’m sure, this is just game publishers once being greedy assholes and wanting more data to exploit.

        • mommykink@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          6 months ago

          Wait, wait, I’m OOTL here. You’re telling me that you need a PSN account to play the game on Steam!??!

          • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Yep, like Ubisoft requiring you to link your Uplay account for some of their games in order to play.

  • 11111one11111@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    6 months ago

    Lol the fact they posted that shows why dev teams are not the ones who make that decision. I would take 0% hope and 100% this is going to be used as the dev teams proof they fought against it. There is one and only one way to have any chance to influence shit like this, tanking profit margins. People who make all the money and sit on boards will never hold simultaneously those positions and give a flying fuck what the customer’s sentiment on the issue is. Nike didn’t get exposed for slave labor on a Tuesday and stop using slave labor by weeks end. Corporations are either forced to make changes by regulatory means that will affect margins or they change when the other factors influence margins but the bottom fucking line is they ain’t doing fuckall unless there is a change in margins.

  • tiberius@lemmy.caM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I am guessing that Playstation is currently doing the moderation for HD2. If they move away from a Playstation owned process, that means Arrowhead’s cost of ownership goes up. Something probably not in the AH’s current budget. Stuck between a rock and a hard place. Overall, not a good place to be.

    Be fully independent and incur high risk. Be published and mitigate some risk.

    • Umbrias@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Mitigate some, gain some other, but ultimately there’s always risk, sometimes that risk is realized. That’s how it works.

  • TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I mean I’ve already requested a refund just on principal and don’t plan on picking the game back up until it’s reversed.

    I love the game but it isn’t worth making one more account to keep track of imo, especially if literally it’s only purpose is to make it easier to ban me in helldivers. nahhh

  • Tulitaa@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    6 months ago

    So I had planned on buying it this weekend but now having second thoughts because of the upcoming requirement. I already have PS Plus but I’m concerned that the player base will tank.