• @No_Support_8363@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    01 day ago

    The wording on that is egregious, they mean they are going to cut the number of all homeless people in half by 2025

    • Possibly linuxOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -7
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I have no idea if that is true I hope it is. I don’t live in the UK but this isn’t exactly helping my understanding of the UK.

      • @cynar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        102 months ago

        The conservatives campaigned on cutting homelessness in half. When in power, they basically cut actual, useful support, in favour of measures that got the homeless out of sight, even if it made things worse (and more deadly) for them.

        The light at the end of the tunnel is that they are currently predicted to lose 44-92% ( 77% nominal) of their total seats in the next election. They also have to call it by January. There is the real possibility of them being almost completely wiped off the political stage.

        • Possibly linuxOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -62 months ago

          Well its never a good idea to have no diversity from a political perspective.

          • @Apepollo11@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            42 months ago

            We’ll still have diversity (such as it is) - we have more than two parties.

            If the local elections are anything to go by, however, the Tories have slipped into third place for the first time in history.

            (Of course, I’m not daft enough to think local elections accurately predict general elections).

  • @Z3k3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    102 months ago

    I don’t think this fits here the current lot in parliament would do this if they thought it would help their numbers

    • Rentlar
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 months ago

      It would double the number of homeless Labour voters so I doubt they would go through with it.

  • HeartyBeast
    link
    fedilink
    82 months ago

    For context. This is a satirical poster popped up in the tube over advertising

  • Mossy Feathers (They/Them)
    link
    English
    5
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Whenever I see this picture I think of these lyrics:

    This is an announcement from Genetic Control

    It is my sad duty to inform you

    Of a four-foot restriction, on humanoid height

    -

    I hear the directors of Genetic Control

    Have been buying all the properties

    That have recently been sold, taking risks oh so bold

    It’s said now that people will be shorter in height

    They can fit twice as many in the same building site

    They say it’s alright

    Beginning with the tenants of the town of Harlow

    In the interest of humanity, they’ve been told they must go

    Told they must go, go, go, go

  • @MNByChoice@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    42 months ago

    Perhaps off topic, and the poster may be satirical, but how is that turning out?

    Have they reduced homelessness? Have they cut any homeless in half?

    Just tired of empty promises.

  • @mkwt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    32 months ago

    I see this and I get the Atlanta Braves fight cheer stuck in my head:

    “Don’t… Stop… The… Chop…”

    • Possibly linuxOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      02 months ago

      I’m not sure we should be making jokes about the Rwandan Genocide

      • no banana
        link
        fedilink
        English
        6
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I’m just saying that the Brits are sending asylum seekers to Rwanda. Pretty tasteless tbh