• hitmyspot@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    If it’s not ready to play, don’t do a playtest. They want to have their cake and eat it. The playtest is for publicity, not testing.

    • Delphia@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      While I agree in principle you will never catch 100% of the bugs pre-launch, has there ever been a game that didnt need at least a few patches in the last 20 years?

      Id be keen to read the exact wording of the clause “Dont say anything negative” and “dont say anything negative without talking to us first” are very different statements. I can understand the devs wanting a chance to say “Yep, we know about that and it will be fixed pre-launch” or “Ill put in a ticket to get that looked at ASAP” to the playtesters before they trash the game publicly.

      • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        So, even at full release, there could be bugs. That makes the suppression of actual opinions worse. If people didn’t call out unfinished projects, they would not get fixed. If they want preorders, stop making buggy mess games.

    • VulKendov@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      If its ready to play, just release it, what’s the point of a playtest if not to test it. Yeah there’s the publicity too, but are we going to pretend that it can’t do both.

      • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Employees do testing, already covered by an NDA. Content creators do publicity. If they are restricted to no negative publicity, then they are not reliable and it’s dishonest.