• 10 Posts
  • 38 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 9th, 2023

help-circle





  • SpaceX wants new regulations regarding satellite brightness.

    Their own satellites (at least the second generation ones) fulfill the requirements set by the astronomers at the Rubin Observatory. Meanwhile the satellites of the competitors OneWeb and Amazon can’t fulfill them without major design changes, because the altitude the satellites orbit at makes a significant difference.

    If the recommendations of the Rubin Observatory report were turned into regulations now, Starlink would barely be affected (they’d just have to stop the gen1 sat production a little early) while the competition would be set back several years.



















  • Yes, but without money from investors they’d have to cover the construction costs from taxes, so it’s not free either.

    And government run initiatives have to be very careful with how they set their goals. If the legal mandate is to maximize the number of apartments constructed, and the people in charge are rewarded based on the number of apartments they created on paper, then the result will likely be the bare minimum of what counts as “apartment”, even if it’s not something most people would want to live in. That means that government initiatives need to specify in high detail what the quality of the apartments should be.

    Investors have the goal of getting their money back through rent, so they will usually ensure that what they pay to build is something people will actually want to live in and pay money for. If the housing shortage is severe enough they too can get away with pretty crappy places, but if there’s enough housing available that renters can be a little picky, any investor who built bare minimum apartments would regret their choice.