The reason I compare them to autocomplete is that they’re token predictors, just like autocomplete.
They take your prompt and predict the first word of the answer. Then they take the result and predict the next word. Repeat until a minimum length is reached and the answer seems complete. Yes, they’re a tad smarter than autocorrect, but they understand just as little of the text they produce. The text will be mostly grammatically correct, but they don’t understand it. Much like a compiler can tell you if your code is syntactically correct, but can’t judge the logic.

Getting an explanation is one thing, getting a complete solution is another. Even if you then verify with a more suited tool. It’s still not your solution and you didn’t fully understand it.

Or, and hear me out on this, you could actually learn and understand it yourself! You know? The thing you go to university for?
What would you say if, say, it came to light that an engineer had outsourced the statical analysis of a bridge to some half baked autocomplete? I’d lose any trust in that bridge and respect for that engineer and would hope they’re stripped of their title and held personally responsible.

These things currently are worse than useless, by sometimes being right. It gives people the wrong impression that you can actually rely on them.

Spezifisch die CSU. Es gibt kein Niveau das die nicht unterbieten.

Wouldn’t that be a great use case for a QR-code?

Well, Wile E. Coyote, no? Road Runner just runs away.

Ist ein schönes Land. Aber die Leute… 🙄

Here’s a wild idea: sit on the blunt side.
Yes, it still won’t be comfortable, but I doubt sitting on a stick with your full weight is, either.

Yes, most times gamescope isn’t required. Thing is, sometimes it is and not having the option is an inconvenience in the best case and makes games unplayable in the worst case.

My partner is currently running PopOS. They somehow managed to combine the chronically outdated Ubuntu packages with a rather counterintuitive UI.
Updates frequently fail, commonly used packages like gamescope aren’t available, overall wouldn’t recommend.

Had it on my Fairphone 4 for a while, but was put off by the very iOS look-and-feel. Ditched it on favour of Lineage.

I moved to Qobuz for that reason. Much better payout for the artists.

I get that. But that doesn’t mean you can demand someone else investing a lot of time in what is commonly unpaid work.

Well, you’re free to patch support for your ancient OS back in. But you can’t expect someone else to do it for free.

Ob da der Alkohol schuld ist?

Nö. Das sind die Regressiven. Was Anderes können die nicht.

Trying to buy back goodwill?

Right? No way this could possibly backfire. Unless, of course, that’s the intended outcome.

Like Silverlight but WASM? Hope it shares the same fate.

Rückständige Bayern tun rückständige-Bayern-Dinge.