IT’S AMAZING! HOLY…

My exact reaction to trying it! I wish I had known about this so much sooner.

When I get asked why, I just say I’m just confirming what Google Maps said to me (which tbf can be outdated) so I get updated!

I’ve gotten so used to lying or social engineering to maintain my privacy, that it felt weird to be honest about actually contributing to a map and telling people what it is.

Thank you so much for recommending this!

You’re welcome! But thank the StreetComplete team for making such a wonderful way to contribute to OSM

Yes! You can download nearby quests for your location, and complete them fully offline. Afterwards, you can connect to the internet to upload your edits to OSM at your earliest convenience.

“You don’t want to go down that road” taken literally

Usually I tend to avoid sarcastic responses, but since no one mentioned it, how about the game of Telephone?

SearXNG also lets you use Google as one of the engines, allowing you to obtain Google search results anonymously.

I made my own list of software, and most of those listed are software I use daily.

I made a list of open source software that you can use in the future when looking for software! My list recommends OpenStreetMap, OsmAnd, and Organic Maps under the “Map Services” section.

I do not know, sorry. Someone who does know is free to answer this, otherwise you could try researching using some of the sources listed in my previous post, or contact some knowledgeable people such as the GrapheneOS team, Mozilla, etc.

Chrome sounds more secure

Chromium is not the same as Chrome. I highly suggest reading the previous posts.

yet I don’t want an advertising company looking at my browsing habbits

There are more privacy respecting options such as ungoogled-chromium and Brave (which can be configured to minimize data collection and bloat).

In the end, the choice is yours.

Either option works.

If anything, I love GrapheneOS for its “Network” permission toggle. It’s nice knowing that my keyboard (or any other unnecessary apps) can’t phone home.

First off, if you’re concerned about phone privacy, consider a custom OS for your phone that respects privacy such as GrapheneOS.

It’s easy to figure out that your device isn’t listening to a constant audio stream 24/7, since that would drain battery and send a lot of noticeable data over the network. However, it is entirely possible to listen for certain keywords as you mentioned, and send them encrypted with another seemingly legitimate packet. There’s no way to be 100% certain, but it is possible in theory without draining too much battery.

The steps you took are good, making sure that apps don’t have any permissions they don’t need. Privacy is a spectrum, so it’s not “all or nothing”. As I mentioned before, if you’re seriously concerned about mobile privacy and want a solution, you can get a custom operating system that can remove any privacy invasive elements. GrapheneOS also allows you to disable the camera and microphone system-wide (although this functionality is present on some other Android builds).

If it eases you any, a lot of these advertisements happen to be coincidence and trigger confirmation bias. It could be that those ads happened to show up by coincidence, or that advertisers managed predicted your interests, or that you got tracked by some other means while downloading the movie. The possibilities are nearly endless.

This depends on what you’re trying to defend against. In my opinion (on GrapheneOS), the “Network” permission, “Modify system settings” permission, “Install unknown apps” permission, and any permission that allows apps to communicate with one another (such as a reduced sandbox, file permission, or app communication scopes). Those are the only permissions that I can think of off the top of my head that could potentially allow an app to phone home.

Having worked in penetration testing before, one tool I used to query SQL databases represented unknown characters as an underscore (_) before the character gets brute forced.

Bonus story: I used to set the hostname for my phone as a transparent character, so it wouldn’t visibly show up if someone ever did a network scan. I accidentally fooled myself with this while doing a network scan, and got frustrated why the “mystery device” wouldn’t load a hostname.

A password with 300 bits of entropy would take 1.288×10^(-138) seconds to crack with the Planck Cruncher :)

Is it relevant, or was it just a neat extra to add?

Just a neat extra. Most passwords are represented in bits of entropy in this context, and I discovered while researching that the proper unit is a shannon.

I may make a writeup about this, considering a password with all possible Unicode characters instead of just the printable ASCII characters.

The Planck Cruncher has refused to comment about this. ;)

1024 bit. The exact number is about 3.6019×10^72 years, which is orders higher than a vigintillion.

One could argue the same about the Tor Project, which has made their own version of Firefox.