Obsydian_Falcon

You’re acting like any government, American or no, can handle the security aspects of a national database. Also, what’s the point? Using an ID to play games, to watch porn? That shit is dumb, you can’t nationalize or control the internet in any form, even with ID specifications. It’s just not a realistic goal

Amen dude, over $500 billion after inflation paid for nationwide fiber, and telecom companies just pocketed that shit. We should’ve been at 500mb down, 250 up since 2015.

It really depends on who uses it, some people have it setup with enough plugins and changes to be a full-blown IDE for their programming language of choice while some just do very heavy text editing

Ahh yes, all us silly kids getting degress and running the logistics that allow you to sell your salmon in the first place. Y’all conservatives just love being divorced from the real world don’t you? I’m all for good fait conversation, but your opinion stated loudly doesn’t make it fact. It just makes you another blustering 'hard worker" who has no idea how the modern world works since your ignorance is so blissful

It’s not only the break in routine but also the direction of the site. All your examples are productivity products while the fediverse is, in essence, social media. The thing with social media is that branding REALLY matters. There have been attempts to copy Instagram or Snapchat or Reddit but they have all failed to gain massive communities due to not being part of a known brand.

“I posted my pics on the gram”

“What’s your snap?” etc…

Kbin, Lemmy, these are just instances of something called the Fediverse, try getting a layperson to understand that.

Social media generally has a rule known as the 90:9:1 rule. 90% of people are lurkers just doomscrolling or passing time, 9% are interacting with content and leaving comments and/or posting, and the final 1% is making the engaging content that sites like Reddit and YouTube are known for.

Right now, FOSS software is often populated by only 10% of that ratio, the power-users and people that interact every so often. Those lurkers, the 90%, migrating them will be hard if not impossible. Remember, they lurk, they will stay where the most engaging content is, and that is still currently Reddit.

How is the take hypocritical? Having a roof over your head and money to spend on nice things isn’t the same as having enough money to live 10 lives and never run out. You’ve drawn parallels that quite literally don’t exist.

Meta also does A LOT of data harvesting, which is what drives profits for them. Due to anonymity, Reddit could never really do the same. Meta, Instagram, and Whatsapp all serve as different routes of recurring revenue for Meta, they can park millions of users on each platform and sell the data collected to interested advertisers. Reddit could never really do the same, so they come up with the next best (worst) thing.

Not anywhere near your age, but I believe that you honestly don’t need to pay attention to any kind of “cutoff” age for video games. At your age, people don’t really get to dictate how interesting your hobbies are to you, you’re an adult with children, and your interests are your own. If playing games is a dealbreaker for women, then it’s really just the tip of the iceberg of problems a relationship with her might have. There is no cutoff for liking the things you like, and if people aren’t adult enough to see that, you can move on from them.