Tried compatibility mode already?

Too late, I am now a proud owner of Citroën

I filtered in IMDb movies where I have voted 7+ while user rating is up to 6 and these jumped out seemingly panned by both critics and users.

1. Gods of Egypt. Visually great, standard action story, don’t get the dislike at all.
2. Tremors 4: The Legend Begins. I have watched most Tremors movies, have given them 6+. The one I disliked most was Tremors: Shrieker Island which I have rated 3.
3. Iron Sky. Do not remember a single thing, but it looks fun. Probably will rematch soon.

Absolute trash for me as well. I watched it alone when I was slightly drunk, thinking oh boy, let’s put on something scary. Absolutely nothing happened. Few movies have left me angry. Insane it has such good critic score.

Blair Witch′s whole shtick of being the first (at least well known) found footage film is interesting from historical perspective, but that’s about it. Much better than Paranormal Activity though.

Don’t remember much of it besides the tattoo scene, but I recall it being alright for this type of movie. Weaker version of Dumb and Dumber maybe?

I remember Sucker Punch being visually pretty, it was the story and overall vibe that was awful.

Valerian was pretty cool, I have given it 7 in imdb. Seems like it globally has mediocre rating. For comparison I have given 3 for Sucker Punch.

It would collapse on itself due to paradox

Never realized there are so many rules for divisibility. This post fits in this category:

Forming an alternating sum of blocks of three from right to left gives a multiple of 7

299,999 would be 999 - 299 = 700 which is divisible by 7. And if we simply swap grouped digits to 999,299, it is also divisible by 7 since 299 - 999 = -700.

And as for 13:

Form the alternating sum of blocks of three from right to left. The result must be divisible by 13

So we have 999 - 999 + 299 = 299.

You can continue with other rules so we can then take this

Add 4 times the last digit to the rest. The result must be divisible by 13.

So for 299 it’s 29 + 9 * 4 = 65 which divides by 13. Pretty cool.

Saw this cover few minutes ago.

Link, starts at 23 seconds.

Check out WhoSampled. It’s the largest resource regarding samples/covers.

Thanks for clarification and great that this is not included in project, but couldn’t someone change the server side code and somehow see more info that goes through?

I know there is that HTML check in https://searx.space/ to see if search interface code is not heavily modified, but on server side anything could go on.

If requests are encrypted in a way that searxng does not see contents then it probably is not trivial to do, but there always is a possibility something clever could be done.

Aren’t all search queries available to whoever hosts an instance? In my eyes this is much worse to privacy and a much bigger risk unless you really know who is behind your chosen instance. I would trust some a company a bit more with safeguarding this information so it does not leak to some random guy.

People need a bit of fun from time to time. This seems lovely and did not cost an arm and a leg to pull off

Source

From article

Reddit challenged its designation on the basis that it is mostly a text-based discussion platform, and links to videos uploaded elsewhere on the internet should not be factored in. The Irish regulator counter-argued that the audio-visual content on the platform is extensive, and pointed to its enormous reach, with 73 million daily users.

Could not find any post statistics, but they probably are correct and percentage wise uploaded videos should be at the bottom, but total count probably is too large to be simply disregarded. Reddit probably has more videos than Vimeo which is purely video based. And if Reddit would be in the clear then so should be Twitter and Facebook since those too are primarily text based.

Because most people did not use 3rd party apps and do not care about site′s management. Why move to someplace else if everything works great where you already are.

Block should be handled by client so any user can decide for themselves.

deleted by creator