It offers possibilities, which are infinitely more probable than systems without such possibilities.

So what you’re saying, Dad, is it’s nascent and already faster? Gotcha.

But also

https://www.forbes.com/sites/victoriaforster/2020/09/02/teen-dies-after-doing--tiktok-benadryl-challengeas-doctors-warn-of-dangers/

#typical

In the future nobody reads “the design of everyday things” apparently

They promise to do it at 7% market share

Ironically I still think those are good requirements

“the oppressor doesn’t get to tell the oppressed how to protest”

Only tangentially related here but the principle remains

IT NOT DEMOCRACY IT DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC HUR DUR (banjo music)

Why did the guy with the penis head turn into boob head. wtf is even

No app or account required:

https://youtu.be/sny3wSsJIoY

It’s the mass that results in gravity, not the density. A giant cloud of gas will have the same gravitational effects as if it were compressed into its solid phase

They do no labor, they create no good, they accomplish no service. Literal rent-seeking.

Sometimes the facts are quite memeable

Both sides are le same

Check that edge Bois!

In the states that’s exclusively how it’s done. No classroom activity would require private ownership of technology.

*with tact

This is why the last step of science is broad consensus, which has solved literally every single example of bad science in this entire thread. All this means is people should pay more attention to sources.

What methodology finally disproved that?