At what point can the Justice Department start considering his statements as threats or incitement of violence? (Not that Garland would ever have the stones to do anything about it this close to the election)

Or, you know, Republican party leadership could grow a spine and condemn this language at the very least, if not pull their support from Trump. These kinds of things would have been disqualifying for any other candidate.

Why we have to just put up with this nonsense is beyond me.

How can you be Star Trek and not be a Generation?!

I mean, that’s the entire point of the autopilot mechanic. That’s how players are meant to travel between planets.

Honestly, people complain about the ship controls but it’s not bad at all. Play around with it for 10 minutes and you’ll be zipping around in no time.

6% is very conservative though. Even at 7%, which is a widely accepted inflation adjusted number, it’s over 2 mil.

A warrior’s drink!

deleted by creator

And how about some tacluchnatagamuntoron too!

I’m honored.

Cry baby, cry

Jaffa kree!

Recent JD Vance interview went something like this:

Lulu Garcia-Navarro: “Senator, yes or no: Did Donald Trump lose the 2020 election?”

JD Vance: “Let me ask you a question. Is it OK that big technology companies censored the Hunter Biden laptop story, which independent analysts have said cost Trump millions of votes?”

Lulu Garcia-Navarro: “Senator Vance, I’m going to ask you again, did Donald Trump lose the 2020 election?”

JD Vance: “Did big technology companies censor a story that independent studies have suggested cost Trump millions of votes? I think that’s the question.”

🤔

Felindiana Jones

The Rebels are comin for your blasters, sheeple!

How is he not listening to Duel of the Fates?

Exactly. Don’t reward this kind of behavior.

Unfortunately, we Americans have proven that most of us would sell our very souls for the smallest convenience…and corporations know it.

Big badda boom

Right…so we would be unable to retask it to observe something else that did not align with the satellite’s current orbital position. Seems like a pretty big limitation to me.

I like how the article discounts other deep space telescope ideas because they would require more advanced technology than we already possess…but then is like “but if we use the sun, all we have to do is send a whole bunch of spacecraft 3 times farther than the farthest thing we’ve ever sent”.

It’s an interesting idea. But even if we got the required satellites that far out, at that distance, how could you expect to aim this sun telescope? Or would it just be stuck with whatever it’s currently pointed at?

“Oh no you di’int”