

My point is that the principle of existing homeowners funding infrastructure for new homes is only tenable when
- developers are not creating huge externalities by creating ever larger suburbs with infrastructure funded by the core (take Ottawa as an example for that dynamic)
- when the base of established homeowners is large enough to support the rate of growth.
In the first case, development fees based on lot size for new sprawling burbs are a reasonable way to push the market towards density.
In the second case, with a high rate of growth in a specific market, other means of redistribution such as government subsidies may be a better way to redistribute.
Truly awful.
This office is part of a complex that includes a Coastal Health urgent care clinic and other provincial government services.
This office is street facing but seems to back against the urgent health care centre.