I don’t think there was much substance at all in this article. They talk about how parts of a bike are safety critical in a very surface level way and it just kind of meanders. I get it, if a part of your bike breaks you can get hurt so it’s important that your bike doesn’t break and we should all think about that. Great. Thanks.
Relax, they’re just staring at the skybox.
This is misleading. This wasn’t a random motorcycle rider speeding. This was a person who commited a crime (theft) trying to flee from the police. The police don’t want us to think of it from that angle because then the secondary question needs to come up, is it safe for police to be engaging in pursuits with criminals on public highways in this manner.
I wonder if AI thinks the flags are copyrighted and refuses to reproduce them accurately.
We’re in the middle of discussions right now. We don’t find out what we gained or lost for a few more weeks.
If you want to go down that path - all of our actions online are environment destroying. This useless comment that I’m making needs to live in a datacenter somewhere, multiply that enough times and the energy needed just to have dumb conversations online is killing the planet on its own.
This article seems like it’s going to try to make a point, but then it sort of just moves on after dropping a buzzword and vaguely describing it’s relevance.
Yearning sounds a lot like limerence to me.
So you pay Spotify money each month. Do you really think that they are paying artists more than you pay them? Doubt it.
This is an industry marketing / blogspam article which only exists to pad out the marketing efforts of the company making the turbine.
It’s not news, and it’s only presenting the viewpoint of the company who is marketing themselves.