Sharing isn’t the issue. The emulator was profiting from it.

I wrote about sharing but even profiting from it should be legally permissible.

If I copied your house key and sold it, would that be alright?

Of course not. There are laws against that. Laws that are not copyright laws.

but I don’t lie to myself that it’s morally defensible.

Oh, sorry, I thought this was about legality. If we want to talk about the morality of evading copyright we should also about the morality of copyright itself, how it historically came to be and whose interests it was supposed to serve (it wasn’t made to support creatives). Actually there is surprisingly little evidence that the introduction of copyright increased the incentives for creatives to publish or made them wealthier (except a select few). I think there is a better case to be made for the morality of sharing creative works unlawfully than for limiting the sharing of those works for a century after their creation.

IANAL, but from a EU-centric perspective on copyright (which is the only one I can reliably talk about) the idea of a proprietary encryption key is bogus. A creative work can be copyrighted if it has sufficient originality (or under some other very specific conditions). Smaller parts of such a work are not copyrighted if they don’t meet that criteria on their own. The encryption key (which is very probably randomly generated and definitely not a creative work) thus can’t be copyrighted on it’s own. At least in the EU, there should be no argument against sharing said key (at least in respect to copyright).

I honestly can’t talk about other jurisdictions (maybe someone else here can) but I imagine it should be similar to this in many other countries.

Had fun with Verdance at my local pre-release event. I think I will keep her and maybe try out the others too. Was originally hoping to play my old Data-Doll deck again after Rosetta now but I’m so sure anymore.

I - for one - welcome the solarpunk future where we’d meet up with friends to watch indie self-published movies because that exploitative but productive industry didn’t make it for lack of a viable business model.

Depends on which hero you want to play. Professor Teklovossen is only really playable in UPF. If you have friends to play that with, great (I don’t🥲). If you want to play the blitz format, you might want want to look into the other mechanologist heroes. I guess Maxx and Teklovossen might be the most interesting to you as the new Dash is quite hard to learn to play. If you want to buy packs, I’d say bright lights should give some playable upgrades. But overall, if you can, buying singles is cheaper.

The Levia gameplay is so fascinating. Currently not allowing myself to start a new deck but when I will she’ll be high on the list.

I have to admit, I have a bad case of wanting to play almost all heroes. Currently defaulting to Victor in CC but experimenting with Nuu, Maxx and Blaze in Blitz. As soon as all the new Heroes in Rosetta are out, I’m thinking of giving Data Doll another try; should be a better meta for her.

Nice write-up, but really not helpful since it has nothing at all to do with what is actually proposed in the initiative.

Honestly not sure how I feel about them but the rules seem straightforward enough. We had so many judge calls at the Mistveil Prerelease. I do hope Rosetta will be better.

Oops, wrong side.

Have a Dominia.

I’m not that new anymore but still relatively fresh (joined last year). Really looking forward to the new wizards and the new guardian.