- 19 Posts
- 55 Comments
14·7 days agoIt’s there, extravagantly, in Andrea Long Chu’s Females: A Concern, which defines the “barest essentials” of “femaleness” as “an open mouth, an expectant asshole, blank, blank eyes”.
Sick porn-brained men don’t get to define womanhood and will never be women
There are facts in the article yet you’re still trying to shoot the messenger. Is this really the best you can do?
So there’s nothing incorrect about the facts and you’re left with nothing other than shooting the messenger?
But Copeland’s fictional erotica took a dark turn in 2021, when he published a story titled “Dangerous Obsession.” In the story, Copeland describes becoming obsessed with a local business owner, who he ultimately murders to assume her identity. The woman murdered in the story is a real individual who was living in Copeland’s community at the time.
It’s a fetish
So you don’t dispute the facts?
Why are men so obsessed with invading women’s spaces? They’ve been told “NO” loud and clear but don’t care about consent. Such male behavior
natural puberty
So you understand the issue and just want to pretend you don’t.
It matches their sex. Stop harming kids
Men don’t belong in women’s spaces no matter how they identify. This man couldn’t have murdered her if he wasn’t in the wrong ward.
You’re right that men are dangerous. They belong in men’s spaces, even if they feel like women
Don’t support violence against women
So you approve of violence against women? Be honest
We will one day view “gender-affirming care” in minors with the same revulsion that we now view frontal lobotomies. Until then, many children will continue to suffer tragic—and irreversible—consequences.
If you support this, you’re on the wrong side of history
I didn’t define sex that way, the entire field of biology did. That’s literally the biological definition. You’re pushing unscientific nonsense if you claim otherwise
Until you are trying to produce offspring with them, or providing them with medical treatment, you have precisely zero interest in the sex of another person, let alone a scientific interest.
Women deserve their own spaces, free of men. Women want their own spaces.
Men that feel like women are still men and can have their own spaces, but don’t get women’s spaces
My claim was that the specific gametes an individual may or may not produce is not socially relevant
You’re denying reality. That man didn’t care how the people he assaulted identified as. Men don’t care if the women they rape identify as men.
Stop speaking over women.
Can you not imagine the possibility that it isn’t the best way to determine it?
The definition you’re pushing is incoherent garbage. If there’s actually a better definition, great. Yours isn’t it.
That still leaves my other citations in tact
I’m not going to wade through a bunch of garbage. You couldn’t even be arsed to figure out that the author isn’t a serious academic and won’t stand behind her own work before citing it. Find real citations first. A shit poll isn’t a citation either
Should we also make science more Christian-inclusive? Avoid teaching things that are offensive to them? That would surely increase the number of scientists.
No, because that would be silly. Science doesn’t care how you identify. Put up or shut up
It doesn’t matter what I think of you, a person on the internet. It takes an immense amount of privilege to claim that sex doesn’t matter in the real world.
Don’t speak over women.
They’ll make one of two gamete sizes, which is how sex is defined.
That link is a great example of why gender studies degrees aren’t worth the paper they’re printed on, goddamn. They’re not doing science, they’re zealots pushing for a new religion to infect science just like creationists of old 🤦
https://www.lifescied.org/doi/10.1187/cbe.21-12-0343
We provide teaching suggestions derived from student interviews for making biology more queer-inclusive.
https://www.shewon.org/