So to avoid the potential of someone going to the generators page in the 5 second window in which it’s public–the first and only time it ever will be–you’d make an entire new email address, and perchance account, and set that up in your browser so you can have both accounts open at once? You do you, but man that seems like a lot of work to avoid that very slim chance 😅
Are you asking about the Lemmy forum specifically? It doesn’t just delete things at random or something like that.
You can find all your own comments and posts by clicking on your name (top-right) and clicking on “profile.” Then you can filter by comments/posts etc.
You’re welcome 🙏
They are generated. The whole image is generated. Hence the term “AI generated image.” It’s never just copy-pasted from a real photo.
Even when you use the name of a celebrity, that face is generated… to look similar to that celebrity. But it’s still generated.
Are you planning on signing out every time you want to work on a version? And making a new version?
What I do while working on a new version is, I work on a private/unlisted copy of the generator. I find that a lot easier. And I can reuse it too. That other copy becomes the backup of the code. And I copy the code across to the public “real” version when I’m ready for the world to see. Just a thought.
A little tip about Lemmy… leave an empty line between things to make sure they’re shown on different lines. This post looks nutty XD
I think there was someone else with a similar problem. They thought it was because of that 4-letter code it happened to generate, but it was probably this. 😅
That’s just the built-in spell checker for your browser. Not sure why it didn’t recognise “noah” and “bradley” but that’s all it is. This isn’t coming from perchance or the generator you are using.
Oh interesting. Maybe they use a different term, or auto-sticky anything from a particular user, or something. Weird…
Could we maybe have fewer of these stickied posts on here? Scrolling past 4 of these gigantic posts every time just to see what’s actually newly posted on here is kinda tiresome. Maybe have a time limit on how long they are stickied at least?
I don’t know for sure, but my guess is people who use this forum are passionate about Perchance on a deeper level and want to stay up-to-date, so probably check here fairly often. So just posting normally should be noticed by most people anyway. Or stickying for just a day or two should let most people find that post. And only if it’s some larger change maybe?
You’re in charge of course. Just putting it out there.
(Also if there’s some way of making Lemmy not make link posts HUUUUUUUUGE that’d be great.)
Cool cool. Do you have any sort of testing set up for perchance? Could be useful for making sure things like this don’t break capabilities.
Oh I see. I’ll keep these things in mind for people that ask.
Ah, got it. So there’s a fix in place, that will slowly roll itself out to each server over time? Cool, will paste links here if/when I find them.
Ah great! Those were both pet peeves of mine, but I thought they’re probably way too deeply embedded to change at this point. Thanks for this! I’ll let you know if I find any new bugs from it. 👍
Perchance is built on JS. Code blocks are []. Functions just have fn() => JavaScript code in them. Plus, you could just put a script tag in the HTML of the page and put JS direct in there if you wanted to. So yeah, you can do loops as usual. 👍
This also means you can call something like the image generator with just a simple js object, normal strings, and so on. Which can make things a lot easier and encapsulated.
Personally, I’d write the image function as not changing values, and just creating the needed HTML and returning that. But you can do things however you want to.
I’m not sure I fully understood, but I got the jist ;p
To generate a random value from a list, access it with .selectOne to get a random item, or .evaluateItem to get a finalised string value. And store that in a variable. So like row_animal = animals.evaluateItem. Then use that in the prompt you send to the image generator function. If you want that to change between rows, after a row ends just run that code again to grab a new random item.
I don’t see the code blending_value = [blending_values.selectAll[counter]] in there at all.
next_matrix_image() is very hard to read… you can use if and else statements so it’s easier to understand (and code, I’d say).
…None of which really matters to your question. I’m just finding it very difficult to even understand what your code is doing or trying to do. 🫠
Is the problem that it changes animal? Looks to me like it’s not changing animal. It always renders horses for me. Is that what you wanted, or didn’t want? What do you actually want to happen? I’m so confused… 😅
If you added it to a gallery, then likely the title has the style listed in it on the gallery.
Tricky thing is, the AI is fed what it has said before so it can continue the thread. I’m guessing that’s the issue–it’s reinforcing itself, making that aspect stronger and stronger in its own prompting.
No idea how to fix it though 😅
@VioneT@lemmy.world