@Godric@lemmy.world to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish • 2 months agoClose but no Cigar!lemmy.worldimagemessage-square29fedilinkarrow-up1205arrow-down115
arrow-up1190arrow-down1imageClose but no Cigar!lemmy.world@Godric@lemmy.world to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish • 2 months agomessage-square29fedilink
minus-square@DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglish5•2 months agoYou should probably look up what Trujillo got up to, since you admit some actions justify intervention. Like, for example, a CIA sponsored coup and assassination. But obviously they’re the good guys, right?
minus-squareMatch!!linkEnglish4•2 months agoi don’t know if this is a hot take but assassinations are better than invasions
minus-square@DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglish0•2 months agoUnless the assassination, for random example, starts a civil war, because the people the imperial power wanted in charge ended up not having enough support to stay in charge. Or if it starts WW1.
minus-square@GBU_28@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglish1•2 months agoNo, the CIA are not the “good guys”, why would you say that?
You should probably look up what Trujillo got up to, since you admit some actions justify intervention.
Like, for example, a CIA sponsored coup and assassination. But obviously they’re the good guys, right?
i don’t know if this is a hot take but assassinations are better than invasions
Unless the assassination, for random example, starts a civil war, because the people the imperial power wanted in charge ended up not having enough support to stay in charge.
Or if it starts WW1.
No, the CIA are not the “good guys”, why would you say that?
Naked sarcasm