• Lexi Sneptaur
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    They worked at LMG, a highly visible company. They’ll get other jobs no problem.

    • Jackthelad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      Again, that may be the case, but it’s still not good for people to lose their jobs in the first place.

      Especially not in this economy.

      • Lexi Sneptaur
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I hope every unethical company goes over and everyone who works at all of them remains unemployed for at least 3 months actually. Unethical companies = employees often complacent and part of the problem.

        I don’t see why you want to defend this

        • Jackthelad@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m not defending the company or the actions of whoever is involved in misconduct. But I also don’t believe in guilt by association.

          Sorry for caring about people’s livelihoods.

          • Lexi Sneptaur
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It isn’t guilt by association. It’s not caring about several people losing their jobs as a result of their employer’s decision to sexually harass women. The few jobs lost isn’t that big of a deal compared to the trauma the female employees were put through. Those people will have no problem finding new work.