• @Telodzrum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    126 months ago

    People are still using GRUB to dual boot? It’s not 2010 anymore. systemd-boot is the objectively superior choice.

          • @Telodzrum@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            26 months ago

            Loud doesn’t mean numerous. Ubuntu, Mint, Debian, Fedora, Arch, and Manjaro take up almost all of the desktop install market.

            • @0x4E4F@sh.itjust.worksOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              16 months ago

              Yeah, and it’s a big market… all 6% of it.

              My point was, systemd is not the only init system, there are others. Just because it’s used by over 90% of the Linux distros out there, doesn’t mean it’s the only one, thus offering a solution that is tied to systemd is not exactly a solution. Grub already has it figured out, why complicate things further.

    • callyral [he/they]
      link
      English
      26 months ago

      does systemd-boot require a distro that runs systemd or is it just the name

    • @AVincentInSpace
      link
      English
      26 months ago

      laughs in rEFInd

      also systemd-boot is just worse GRUB, CMV

      • @Telodzrum@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        16 months ago

        I have no desire to engage with an objectively incorrect view. However, you are the second person to mention refind which I am unfamiliar with and I’m intrigued.

        • @AVincentInSpace
          link
          English
          1
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          systemd-boot is GRUB but without customization and fewer supported features (LLVM root etc). What more is there to say?

          rEFInd is (as the name implies) an EFI bootloader that, on every boot, scans all attached storage devices for a bootable partition and presents all those found in a boot menu with a quite nice graphical theme