• @ProgrammingSocks
      link
      English
      7
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Spoken like someone who doesn’t understand why people engage with art in the first place. AKA a techbro.

        • @ProgrammingSocks
          link
          English
          23 months ago

          Because most people don’t engage with art critically. See Marvel movies. Maybe others are fine with remixed slop but I am not.

      • @UnderwaterSwift@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        03 months ago

        It has already happened in our lifetime with medical illustration. This is pre-gpt. It will just now spread. Are generated diagrams worse in subtle ways? Yes, but not enough to matter for the difference in first or ease of use.

        • @tacomama@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          English
          23 months ago

          Nah. Association of Medical Illustrators

          I have a Masters in Medical Art. (late 1980s) 35 years ago some were saying ‘we won’t need medical artists because of photography’ and then a few years later ‘because of personal computers’. This isn’t the case. But when the general public has access to a tool they love to talk about how a discipline is going away because ‘now anyone can do it’.

    • @exocrinous@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      33 months ago

      If AI becomes responsible for producing Disney musicals, then they probably won’t have any gay-coded characters anymore. What about Scar? What about Ursula? What about Gaston? What about Shang??

      We need human artists because humans are capable of sneaking content that is actually societally beneficial into what would otherwise be soulless corporate products.