• @bountygiver@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1528 days ago

    yup if any dating service needs you to pay a subscription instead of a one time payment and it helps you until you succeed, they have an active incentive to keep you as a customer as long as possible and guess what makes you stop being a customer.

    • @jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1028 days ago

      Weirdly, none of them really focus on the non-monogamous market. There’s a section of likely long term users.

      • @ryathal@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        528 days ago

        I’m not someone remotely into that market, but my understanding is there isn’t a huge demand for this outside the Ashley Madison type who are cheating. The various cliques have their own methods of finding each other and generally aren’t interested in broadcasting that to a wider market.

        • @jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1028 days ago

          A lot of the polyamorous people I know are on the apps or have tried them, but aren’t happy with them. Partly because the apps generally aren’t good, and partly because you end up with a lot of wasted “your desired relationship structure isn’t what I want” matches.

          OkCupid has some support for it, but that app hasn’t been good or interesting in years. Tinder lets you pick your relationship type, but you can’t like filter by it. Soneone threatened to “report me” on Hinge (I think?) for wanting a non monogamous relationship. Maybe they thought relationship anarchy was something dangerous.

          This might be different outside of NYC, where I am.

          • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod
            link
            fedilink
            English
            327 days ago

            This might be different outside of NYC, where I am.

            Dating outside of a major city is incredibly hard, and being non-mono makes it even harder.