Joe Biden will this week sign an executive order to temporarily close the southern US border to asylum seekers in a sharp political U-turn aimed at winning support on a key voter concern in a presidential election year.

The US president is expected to sign the order as early as Tuesday to seal the border with Mexico to migrants when numbers of asylum claimants rise above a daily threshold of 2,500.

Mayors of several US border cities are expected to be present in the White House for Biden’s announcement.

Biden’s move echoes a similar approach adopted by Donald Trump in 2018 when he was president and reverses his one-time philosophical opposition to his predecessor’s hostility to migrants. When he was a presidential candidate, Biden denounced Trump’s policy, saying it upended decades of US asylum law.

He has been forced to change course as the number of asylum seekers coming through the US-Mexico border has surged during his presidency, with opinion polls consistently showing immigration to be at or near the top of voters’ concerns, ahead of inflation and the economy.

An attempt by the White House to cobble together legislation tightening border restrictions by tying it to aid to Ukraine and Israel failed earlier this year after Republican lawmakers withdrew support, apparently at the urging of Trump, who did not want Biden to claim credit for resolving an issue he has attempted to make his own.

According to CBS, which broke the story, Biden’s executive order will enable US immigration officials to quickly deport migrants who enter the country illegally without processing their asylum claims.

Controversially, it will rely on a presidential authority known as 212 (f) which became infamous during Trump’s presidency because of its use to enforce certain immigration restrictions, including travel bans from Muslim countries.

Like Trump’s restrictions, Biden’s order is likely to face legal challenges.

Migration at the southern border surged to record numbers at the end of last year. But the order comes at a moment when the number of migrants crossing from Mexico is down in the past six months, a trend attributed to stronger enforcement on the part of the Mexican authorities but which is not expected to sustain itself.

An estimated 179,000 “border encounters” were recorded in April, according to US Customs and Border Protection figures, compared with a record high of 302,000 last December. More than 3,500 migrants were said to have crossed various points along the 2,000-mile border illegally on Sunday alone.

Biden initially rolled back Trump’s restrictive border policies after taking office in January 2021, issuing orders to freeze his predecessor’s border wall construction and reissuing protections set up under the 2012 Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (Daca) scheme originally adopted by the Barack Obama White House.

Biden suspended Trump’s Remain in Mexico policy – whereby asylum seekers were forced to wait in Mexico while their US immigration claims were being considered – on the first day of his administration before the homeland security department formally cancelled it months later. The US supreme court subsequently upheld Biden’s approach following a lower court ruling against it.

When Trump’s policy was in operation, Biden denounced it, saying: “This is the first president in the history of the United States of America [under whom] anybody seeking asylum has to do it in another country. That’s never happened before.”

A recent Associated Press poll showed about two-thirds of voters, including 40% of Democrats, disapproved of Biden’s handling of the southern border.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    24
    ·
    6 months ago

    People always want to say if you don’t like Biden, it makes you a single issue voter…

    But he just keeps racking up so many ways he doesn’t represent the will of Dem voters.

    We barely won 2020, we won’t win 2024 with a candidate who does shit like this.

    • pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      6 months ago

      He doesn’t have any choice. Congress controls immigration policies, and the infrastructure that’s in place to handle them is not equipped to handle the current numbers.

      The GOP is going to kill any immigration policy changes that the democrats put forth, so it’s shut down the border or let the system collapse. Neither are good options.

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        6 months ago

        It’s amazing how when it’s bad, it’s congress’s fault, but when it’s good it’s all because of Biden.

        American rescue plan, infrastructure, etc. none of those would have passed without some seriously heavy lifting from congressional peeps, too.

        • pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          I mean, Biden literally can’t do anything else in this situation. And congress is the problem a majority of the time. The president just makes a good scapegoat.

          • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            6 months ago

            And by that same logic, Biden couldn’t do anything for the ARP or the infrastructure packers and such like.

            Is it fair to say it’s entirely Biden’s fault? Absolutely not. It it’s also not fair to say he hasn’t played a role in this not working.

            Especially, if you take a step back and realize he’s been part of congress for longer than I’ve been alive and his leadership as a senator has helped lead us to where we are. Which incidentally, is another thing Biden likes to take credit when it’s beneficial and dodge blame when it’s not.

        • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          American rescue plan, infrastructure, etc.

          Those only passed because Democrats controlled the Congress and they were eligible for reconciliation, ie filibuster-proof.

          Immigration reform isn’t eligible for reconciliation, and anyway Democrats don’t control the House now. That’s why it hasn’t passed.

          • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            /golfclap.

            Missed the point entirely. If Biden wants to take the sole credit for something he had extensive help on, both chambers of congress (nominally,) and much vaunted ability to “work across the aisle”….

            Then he can also take some of the credit for things failing, too. Especially things that failed congress while democrats still had that nominal control.

            Like abortion rights and voting rights. But you know what, we should just sweep those under the rug. You know. Why even bother.

            It’s not like the democrats will allow anyone but a leashed geriatric get the nomination anyways.

            • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              Abortion and voting rights, like immigration reform, are not eligible for reconciliation and would have been filibustered even when Democrats controlled Congress.

              And Biden gets credit for delivering the things he promised because he knew they were doable with 50 Senators. I don’t blame him for not doing the impossible. It would be like blaming him for not curing cancer.

              • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                Well if you want to use misguided analogies… you do realize Biden did promise to protect voting rights and access to abortion, right?

                And in any case the point I’m trying to make is that Biden is still the kid that takes credit for doing the full report even though he pretty much did the intro cuz it was the safest thing.

                Biden didn’t get those things passed. democrats did.

                Edit to add: democrats have a problem with replacing the old guard. Probably should have started letting others get credit so the party has a viable future.

                • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 months ago

                  Biden did promise to protect voting rights and access to abortion

                  Which he did, via the DoJ.

                  What he didn’t do is promise to pass new legislation on those topics.

                  Biden didn’t get those things passed. democrats did.

                  The president, vice-president, and Congressional Democrats all played important roles, which he acknowledges.

                  For example, in a statement:

                  Leaders across sectors, at the national, state and local levels praised the historic progress made over the last year and the benefits still yet to come from the Inflation Reduction Act – made possible by the Biden-Harris Administration and Congressional Democrats, without a single Republican vote.

                  And in a speech:

                  Folks, this law is transformative. And it feel — you know, it fell entirely to Democrats to deliver it.

    • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      6 months ago

      We barely won 2020, we won’t win 2024 with a candidate who does shit like this.

      With Democrats like these, who needs Republicans?

    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      What do you suggest he do with the migrants that exceed our sanctuary cities’ housing abilities? Leave them homeless after busing? Welcome to NY. Pick an alley.

    • GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      Ah, ignorance. There is no choice with the current Congress.

    • Ech@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      You’re either misinterpreting the criticism or talking to people that don’t know wtf they’re talking about. Neither mean single issue dems aren’t a problem.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        Single issue voters don’t really exist.

        No one cares about a single thing in their own country and nothing else.

        But what often happens with large protests, specific about civil/human rights, is when a lot of people unite under one cause, others try to divide them.

        Because when people unify around one thing, they tend to work together on the next thing.

        If you’re not careful, before you know it progress is happening…

        And a lot of very rich people don’t like progress

        • Ech@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          6 months ago

          They absolutely do exist. The GOP built their base on cobbling those voters together into one force. As long as they make empty gestures to their variety of issues, their SIVs keep in line no matter what other horrid shit they do. It’s taken a much more sinister bent, lately, but the core is still there.

          Dems have the reverse issue - voters declaring they won’t support them if they don’t address one issue, with the biggest and latest being the invasion of Palestine. There are absolutely voters out there that will ignore the rest of the good things done by their candidate, or worse, ignore how things will just get worse without them, all because of one little grievance. Dems have always had a bit of a purity test problem, but it’s multiplied into a much bigger problem this cycle.

          And all this said, I’m not dismissing your point that division is a serious issue, but not working together because of these singular issues is a big part of the problem.