help-circle
  • @Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    07 days ago

    Not stupid just single track minded. Doing as told with no deviation. The stupid ones are the officers driving the r&d battalions

  • @Jesus_666@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1118 days ago

    Laser tanks are impractical. What if the enemy wears mirrored shades? That laser goes right back and kills you instead. You don’t want your 100 million dollar tank to be taken out by a pair of Ray-Bans.

    • @FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      48 days ago

      The US military has in the past used some large vehicle mounted beam weapons that make your skin burn like all hell, such as the Active Denial System, and I wonder if those could be deflected as well or if they’re the part of the spectrum that needs more sophisticated shielding?

      • @knightly
        link
        English
        25 days ago

        Those aren’t lasers, they’re millimeter-wave radio beams.

        Yes, they can be deflected pretty easily, but you’ll need metal shield that’s big enough to entirely hide behind.

  • Norgur
    link
    fedilink
    388 days ago

    I only we had something we could fire that do almost the same arc as that. That would be ballin’! So I’d call it ballistics

    • @neo@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      268 days ago

      Ridiculous! You would basically need the mass of a planet for that to work.

      • Norgur
        link
        fedilink
        168 days ago

        Dangit! We won’t find that anywhere on Earth!

    • @Pringles@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      58 days ago

      That would work if the earth wasn’t flat. As it is, you need to transport the artillery below their position and shoot them from there. Like Ender shooting through the ice clouds.

  • polonius-rex
    link
    fedilink
    318 days ago

    the tank is confused by its own reflection and attempts to fight itself

    • @Socsa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      57 days ago

      This is why certain Army weapons are not appropriate for the Marines

    • Seraph
      link
      fedilink
      358 days ago

      …the color of a blaster bolt (character-scale or starship scale) is determined by the quality of the gas used in it - higher quality gives you green, lower quality gives you red. The Rebellion didn’t have access to the highest quality gas, and had to make do with the lower quality ammunition.

      Huh, I guess I wondered but never looked it up until now.

      • TurtlePower
        link
        fedilink
        English
        108 days ago

        I mean, that’s how it was retconned, but it was originally just so viewers could tell if it was the good guys or bad guys shooting. Just like there were only supposed to be blue (good guys) and red (bad guys) lightsabers. As the Star Wars universe and lore expanded, things got retconned and added/changed/removed, and it’s still happening with the new stuff that comes out. Isn’t world-shaping neat?

  • bufalo1973
    link
    fedilink
    English
    268 days ago

    If you fire a laser against a mirror, it bounces but raises the heat of the mirror so you end up melting the mirror and destroying the drone.

    • @skulblaka@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      248 days ago

      I may risk being too credible here, but a $80 drone is a lot more expendable than a $40m laser tank. The drone can be considered a consumable. Hell, mark the drones down as ammo.

    • nukeM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21
      edit-2
      8 days ago

    • @CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      108 days ago

      Depending on how long you do it, how powerful the laser, and how quickly it can cool off at the same time.

      And like the other guy said, you can make really good mirrors if you only care about one wavelength.

      • @mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        88 days ago

        In all seriousness, wavelength-specific dielectric mirrors can approach six nines of reflectivity.

        The hard part is hitting the mirror instead of the drone.

    • @zaphod@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      197 days ago

      Inverse square law is just a geometric limitation, focus your lasers more, problem solved.

      • @mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        47 days ago

        “You see, men, the lethal range is limited by this airy disk… stop giggling!

  • @Socsa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    87 days ago

    This was a real concept for the anti-ICMB 747. The idea was to loiter it outside air defense range and then send drones in as reflectors to target the lasers much closer to the threat.

    • @CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Interesting! Yeah, I think in the right atmospheric conditions this could absolutely work.

      Why it’s NCD, as drawn, is that shells already exist and do exactly this when fired on an indirect arc.