Populism Updates @PopulismUpdates Tell me your most radical position that cannot be placed on the left-right political spectrum

Admiral Snaccbar @Chris Mench Serving shrimp with the tail still on when it’s already mixed into something (pasta, rice, etc) is insane.

  • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    136
    ·
    2 months ago

    When driving you are making things more dangerous and less efficient by waving people in. If it is your right of way take it.

    Be predictable, not polite.

    • Snowclone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Almost got into an accident last night on this. Car 1 stopped at a 4way to my right, Car 2 opposite me stopped, then I stopped. Distinctly. Whole ass seconds between all stops. Me and 2 are waiting for 1 to go. It’s 11:00pm. I can’t say for sure, but I just KNOW Car 1 was waving his hands at us, who can’t see through his windshield because that’s how night time works. Way too much time passes, and me and 2 are like, fuck it and start going, then 1 flashes his brights and goes narrowly missing both of us. Was he just really wanting to be an a car accident? Is he drunk? Who knows, but half the accidents I’ve narrowly avoided involve a 4 way stop and an idiot.

    • ThirdWorldOrder@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      I point this out to my kids on a regular basis. My oldest is 15 and about to get his license. I tell him that cars being polite are being dicks to those behind them.

      Your quote is the exact quote I say to him.

    • XIIIesq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Drivers that want to queue in single file when you should use all available lanes and then merge in turn at the front.

      REEEEEEEEEE!!!

      Edit: I really want to know the thoughts of the people that downvoted this lol

      • Magnergy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        Simple, orderly zippering when a lane actually ends is the way. Wasting that useful pavement to create slower traffic and more traffic jam is insane and should be ticketed.

        • XIIIesq@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          The most infuriating are the wannabe policeman that straddle both lanes to stop people passing.

          Like, if you wanna sit in a queue for no reason then good for you, don’t stop people passing that have actually bothered to read the highway code.

          • Magnergy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            Yeah. It isn’t about cheating, fairness, who got in a lane first. Isn’t territory to defend. We don’t have to enforce rules on each other. The traffic planners and road crews went through a bit of effort with like signs and cones and shit to tell us where they want us to merge. Zippering helps everyone go faster. Kinda why the planners want us to do it.

      • luciferofastora@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Got into that with my MIL once.

        When confronted with the idea of leaving an emergency lane in a traffic jam, she also vehemently insisted she’d never done that.

        That woman shouldn’t drive.

    • CoolMatt@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      In my city there is a very popular good samaritan trap on the main drag into town, and I am waiting for the day something nasty happens at that particular parking lot entrance, so then they maybe redesign that section of the street or something.

    • lad@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I first thought you were talking about waving to pedestrians to cross when you stop to let them go. Which (edit: stopping and waiting) is a correct and expected behaviour, afaik

      • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        Stopping for pedestrians at cross walks is correct, but you should never be waving at anyone to go.

        When you wave at people to go they are less likely to check that the other lanes are safe for them to cross. You stop and look right at them so they know you see them and wait until they go on their own.

      • Snowclone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        That’s fine. That’s telling a pedestrian you have seen them and are obeying the rules of the road. That’s reasonable.

    • Bertuccio@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Misunderstanding “right of way” is half the problem.

      Right of way is ability to make a road, or the road itself by extension. You can’t have the right of way - it’s usually the government’s - and you can’t give it away. This is why wording is consistently who must yield the right of way, and not who has the right of way.

      If it’s a driver’s turn to act, they are obligated to act. It’s not their option or right to act.

      • elephantium@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’ve usually heard “right of way” used in terms of sense 3 of the dictionary. I’ve never heard it used to refer to the ability to make a road – that just makes me think you have a skilled construction crew on speed dial.

        • Bertuccio@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          2 months ago

          Dictionaries list common usage - even if incorrect. Look up the definition of right of way for your state or other government and I’m certain it will be the thing on which you travel or the right to create and manage it, not your “rights” while traveling on it.

          I couldn’t find a list of all definitions by state but the three states I checked all use that.

          It would be weird if they didn’t, since that’s been the term since before automobiles existed: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_of_way

      • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        Indeed, in the boating world, the words are “stand-on” or “burdened” vessel, which makes it clear that the vessel that should continue its course has the obligation to do so under the collision regulations. The “give way” vessel should alter its course or intentions to “keep clear.” Nobody — nobody! — has the “right of way.”

      • XIIIesq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        There’s actually no legal definition for “right of way” in the UK. Despite it being a widely understood concept, if you go to court to defend yourself in a road traffic accident and your defence is “it was my right of way, your honour”, you could find yourself in trouble.

          • XIIIesq@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Ok. I was referring to the commonly known and understood “right of way” in regards to road traffic, I thought that was obvious but perhaps I could have made it clearer, but thanks for letting me know of the term in regards to access to land and public rights of way.