• python@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 hours ago

    It might be a regional thing? I live in a Town known for its Technical University, so most of the people on Tinder are socially awkward and tech literate 18-25 y/os who either don’t like going to noisy places like bars, clubs etc. or just prefer texting first before committing time to a date (free time is kind of hard to make as a student here).

    My own reason was more on the autistic side, as I do NOT recognize flirting unless it is specifically stated. So having an app where both parties can state “hey, we’re talking with romantic intentions here!!” was the best solution ever haha (I met my husband within 30mins of installing the app 🤷)

    • accideath@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Hm, maybe. Where I lived, your chances were low if you’re a nerd and/or looking for something serious. Like, most people on tinder were the exact same crowd you‘d also meet in clubs. But it also wasn’t a particularly big town and most people on tinder in my age range were university students from the less nerdy faculties…

    • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      For you yes, that’s not the norm. In average cities/towns, it’s used for hook ups (shallow ones) and cheating. Can you meet a person there? Sure but odds are very much against it.

      Note, I’m talking about Tinder specifically, dating apps are fine.

      • python@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        On an individual level? No idea, I have no experience with that lol

        On a systemic level? The problem seems to be that people assume dating apps are only for hookups, so people who are looking for something serious avoid them. So the idea becomes true through self-validation. Breaking that cycle somehow would make everyone involved happier I think?