• Rayquetzalcoatl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 minutes ago

    Can one thing please not be full of adverts :( I’ll pay for the browser, I just want marketers to fuck off for a while lol

  • modulus@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I kept giving Mozilla the benefit of the doubt and telling myself things weren’t so bad.

    I was wrong.

    I’ll continue using Firefox because it’s the least bad option, but I can’t advocate for it in good faith anymore, and I don’t expect it to last long with this orientation.

    So it goes.

    • Joeffect@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      28 minutes ago

      I could see them trying to take themselves away from Google which wouldn’t be a bad thing as that’s where most of the money comes from for them … Unless that’s changed recently…

  • Majestic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 minutes ago

    My problem with this in spite of the dire situation they face if Google is forced to cut funding by anti-trust court rulings (or not even forced but they make paying off Mozilla a moot point so they stop) is that they become an ad company. Ads become tied to their CEO compensation, to the salaries of the people who develop it.

    They claim they’re making a better kind of ad network, a privacy respecting kind. The problem is the ad industry doesn’t want less data, they want more. There are no looming laws that would force the ad industry to adopt a more privacy respecting alternative or die and without that the ad industry is going to shun this and it’ll be a failure and then they’ll have a failed ad network that they can either discard entirely or adapt to industry standards of privacy invasion and abuse and continue to exist and then they’ll make another “hard choices” post about having to do that.

    And I can see it now. This experiment will fail and after some pressure from the ad industry and some devil-on-shoulder whispering Mozilla will begrudgingly start to enshittify. Their ad network will become less privacy respecting by tiny little steps, by salami-slicing or boiling the frog, the whole privacy-preserving measurement thing will be thrown out BUT they’ll still claim they respect you more than Google and will at first perhaps but that will erode. Maybe they’ll just implode at some point after that which given Google is being found a monopoly works just fine for Google and the rest of big tech who want a more centralized, locked down browser company that wants to help implement DRM that can’t be circumvented, that wants to help lock down everything on the web to restrict users freedoms to choose what is displayed or if they can save it or record it or copy it to say nothing of blocking ads.

  • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    At this point, I don’t see many other options to keep everything going for Firefox. If they somehow lose the go*gle money they use to keep themselves going, they need another revenue source and I severely doubt there are enough Firefox users willing to pay enough to keep it going as it currently does. Don’t like it, but I’m gonna at least play devil’s advocate.

    • d-RLY?@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 hours ago

      It would be nice if they at least allowed for even being able to donate to the browser itself. All the options that I am aware of are either the paid extra stuff they have, or to the overall company. Which is annoying since I imagine that the current “donation” option means that the money is being used mostly for the upper execs and routed to the extra shit that already has options for paying subs.

  • heavy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    6 hours ago

    What if we could have a world that wasn’t powered by ads? I’d like to get past this “only one way to run the internet” train of thought.

    I’m just so tired of ads, commercials and advertising in general. It’s exhausting.

    • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      It’s either that, a subscription model of some sort, going to pay to install models, or something else to fund themselves. I’d suggest going to a donation based model, but I doubt there’s enough Firefox users willing to pay to even be able to keep it alive more than a year or two tops.

    • cornshark@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Well, do you subscribe to news sites, YouTube Premium, Kagi? The world you dream of is available to you today

      • funtrek@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 minutes ago

        Actually, I do. I have a YouTube Premium subscription and subscriptions for two news sites. And on top of that a ton of Patreon subscriptions and offline memberships. I am the one who knocks pays.

      • d0ntpan1c@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Even of they reduced everything down to just Firefox, Thunderbird, and all in infra to run those products (Mozilla accounts, addons stores, hosting, dev/build services…), as well as continuing to pay for dev time on open source they use/contribute to, and the time their employees put into w3c and other foundation/standards/steering initiatives, I don’t think you’d want to see the cost of a monthly subscription.

        This stuff costs way more than people think it does, and behind the scenes Mozilla does a lot of work (with google, Microsoft, apple) on web standards, and trust me, you want them still involved seeing as each other browser group involved is well… You know… Much worse for privacy generally.

        YouTube premium and kagi aren’t even remotely in the same league for comparison when it comes to the cost and value a “Firefox” or “Mozilla” subscription would be.

  • cybermass@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Does this mean they are gonna brick ublock origin and force me to Google’s 3.0 shit? (I forgot the name of it)

    • d0ntpan1c@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Very unlikely. They will support new extension API’s (they are already 90%+ compatible with manifest v3) bit Mozilla has committed to maintaining compatibility for the manifest v2 API’s that don’t exist in v3.

      Claims otherwise are FUD.

    • Vik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Manifest v3? I gather they’re already moving towards this but not in a manner which harms ad blocking

  • ItsComplicated@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    In parallel to our existing consumer products, we have the opportunity to build a better infrastructure for the online advertising industry as a whole. Advertising at large cannot be improved unless the tech it’s built upon prioritizes securing user data. This is precisely why we acquired Anonym.

    Catering to the ad industry is backwards thinking, imo. Securing user data is easy enough if you do not collect it to begin with.

    Imo, the fact companies have changed the narrative in favor of advertisers and data collection, proves only profit matters, not the people.

  • BroBot9000@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    107
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Hey, Laura. Fuck you. Fuck your profits and your corporate greed. Enshit yourself till you close down.

  • merde alors@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    She went on to work at eBay for 13 years, followed by PayPal, Skype, and Airbnb. source

    why would Mozilla choose to be directed by an ebay+paypal+airbnb experience and can somebody with that background not think like this ☞

    “Because Mozilla’s mission is to build a better internet. And, for the foreseeable future at least, advertising is a key commercial engine of the internet, and the most efficient way to ensure the majority of content remains free and accessible to as many people as possible.”

    • merde alors@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Advertising will not improve unless we address the underlying data sharing issues, and solve for the economic incentives that rely on that data.

      thanks to Mozilla for assuming the responsibility of improving advertising

      We can’t just ignore online advertising — it’s a major driver of how the internet works and is funded. We need to stare it straight in the eyes and try to fix it. For those reasons, Mozilla has become more active in online advertising over the past few years. - MARK SURMAN, PRESIDENT, MOZILLA source

      if we stay with that metaphor of “We need to stare it straight in the eyes and try to fix it”, it’s not difficult to imagine Mark and Mozilla being swallowed by the monster he’s “staring straight in the eyes” :/

      i hope they can filter the shit Mozilla will include in Firefox from mull and mullvad

      • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        4 hours ago

        She’s not particularly wrong, but this highlights the problem for me.

        Why does the corporate arm behind one of the last “free” browsers out there need to become involved in this clear conflict of interest?

        Why does this need to be developed as core functionality in the browser codebase instead of as an addon like most of the previous experiments?

        There is repeated insistence that this is key to the future of the web. I don’t neccessarily disagree. I disagree entirely that this should have any direct contact with the Firefox project. Create a separate subsidiary within Mozilla for this shit. Anything to maintain a wall between the clearly conflicting goals.

        This all reads like a new CEO coming in hungry to make a mark rather than actually just be a steward to keeping business as usual going.

  • 9point6@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Not everyone?

    Does anyone?

    Good thing we can fork, I guess, but it’s kinda sad to watch a previously good org die

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Fork, blah, blah, blah.

      When one of these forks doesn’t depend on Mozilla to do all the heavy lifting of security updates and compatibility fixes, then maybe we can talk seriously about forks. But no fork does fuck-all towards the hard part of maintaining a web browser engine. So forks mean nothing.

        • ikidd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Well, if users don’t the source of the actual work, then none of the forks survive. I don’t know what people think are going to happen.

          Shitting on Mozilla seems to be a competitor sport around here sometimes, and it’s fucking self-defeating. In 5 years, there will only be the Chromium engine, and then Google will shut down the opensource side like they pretty much did with Android. And then we’re truly fucked.

      • picnicolas@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Does it support containers and sync settings between installs on multiple systems? If so I’m in without hesitation.

          • picnicolas@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Thanks. Just set it up on one of my computers. I’ll be doing the rest as time allows. There’s a lot I love about it already, familiar but with better defaults, and including search engines like SearXNG. I hope enough of us can switch and send a message to Mozilla, though that feels very unlikely to stop the enshittification.

            • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 hours ago

              oh they’re full on corpo now it sounds like, which is too bad. They should have gone the proton route and go full non-profit org controlled, but here we are.

        • muhyb@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          It’s basically hardened Firefox, you can do all the same things here too. Alas using it with an account kind of defeats the purpose. However you can use your account once to sync everything.