• cadekat
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I’d argue that people got way too excited about what NFTs offer. Being able to own/transfer a digital item with a standardized interface is interesting technically (and has real value, for example ENS names), but holy hell did people go all Beanie Baby on them…

    • flashgnash@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      That’s not arguing with my point though, people definitely did get excited about perceived value, but it didn’t really benefit most people in any way because it was only a promise, not an actual thing

      LLMs and other generational AI produce something that immediately has value

      If I ask chatgpt to write me a python function I now have a python function I can use, if I ask it to explain something and then attempt to apply that knowledge I’ve learned something useful

      If I bought an nft the value of that nft would only be what people decide it is worth

      • cadekat
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Oh, sorry, I wasn’t intending to argue against your main point. For the most part, I agree with you.

        What I don’t agree with is that the value of NFTs (as a technology) is dubious. Instead I think it’s overstated.

        In the same vein as “LLMs can write Python”, NFTs provide ownership information. Regardless of what some asshat pays for a picture of a monkey, the underlying technology still has merit.