• KoboldCoterie
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Given that, I expect you’ll be voting for the ‘less bad’ candidate, rather than wasting your vote on a protest candidate which only assists the ‘more bad’ candidate in winning, then?

      • Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        No, I will not be voting. If I were to be able to vote, I would prefer a candidate who works to stop innocent people from being killed, rather than condone it happening. I find that quite an important moral issue.

          • Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            You can’t go from an “if” to a “you” accusatory statement so well when that “if” isn’t true.

            • KoboldCoterie
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              If the ‘If’ isn’t true, then the ‘you’ doesn’t apply to you, that’s how conditionals work.