• hperrin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    91
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    “It was just a joke!”

    Oh, I don’t get it. Can you explain to me what the joke is? Like, can you put into words why you find that funny?

    • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I think it’d be subverting expectations. From the start you might think it’s about the Pacific trash island that has collected there, but then it turns the other way and calls Puerto Rico a trash island. A decently funny joke imo, even if rude. I’ve seen the same joke being done about the UK and it did get a proper chuckle out of me.

      • taladar@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        57 minutes ago

        The main difference is that the UK used to be powerful and did a lot of bad things to a lot of countries around the world. Puerto Rico on the other hand has always been weak so it feels weird for someone in a much more powerful area of the world to pick on them.

        • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          49 minutes ago

          It can be meaner but for a stand-up I think it could be fine, if the context is comedy and it didn’t have genuine hatred behind it. In this case it’s clear that it was used as a tool of hatred and not just for making a joke.

  • Xanthrax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    Tony, Chapelle, and Joe Rogan are actively murdering comedy. They blame everyone but themselves because they can’t get with the times. They look down on people and punch down constantly, and still manage to miss the mark. They are not down to earth, they are not relatable, and they should NOT be looked up to.

  • ButtermilkBiscuit@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Tony Hinchcliffe is not funny. Watched his podcast for a while then totally abandoned it because I realized I wasn’t laughing during most episodes. It’s mostly seasoned comics taking cheap shots at amateurs and then saying some racist shit while they all laugh and no one in the audience does. His nasally voice is annoying as fuck and hitching his wagon to the trump train seems pretty on brand for that fuckwit. His comedy brand caters to the same people who really like Joe Rogan and Alex Jones, both regulars on the podcast. Shocking I know.

    • Illuminostro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      6 hours ago

      He’s auditioning for a job with Shaprio’s outfit, or some other similar conservative shitpile. It’s not a coincidence that 99% of Right Wing grifters are failures in the entertainment business. Failed actors, comedians, screenwriters, musicians. They’re all narcissists, and more than a little psychopathic. They all think cruelty = comedy. They’re shitty human beings who should be ostracized.

  • DogPeePoo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Piece of shit human trash calls Puerto Rico “trash”. Republicans are shit 💩

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    They’re absolutely terrified of Puerto Rican statehood, so they try to drive them away.

    Little piss-baby cowards.

  • BoobaAwooga@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    8 hours ago

    What a fucking cunt Jesus Christ. The racist rhetoric has really stepped up these past few months since there’s been 0 consequences

  • lobut@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    The joke only works if you understand that it’s not true and that no one can obviously believe it.

    If it’s done where you and everyone thinks it’s true, you’re at a Klan rally or probably at the comedy mothership or something.

  • ÞlubbaÐubba@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    49
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I’m sure insulting puerto rico will really help ðeir ambition of winning ð state wið ð largest population of puerto ricans outside ð island itself!

      • HomerianSymphony@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        57 minutes ago

        Wow, I can’t believe ðere are so many people here who would downvote someone just for using variant orþography. SMH.

      • ÞlubbaÐubba@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        39
        ·
        8 hours ago

        NO IT ISN’T! Launches into multiparagraph long rant about ð importation of ð Gutenberg press mid GVS ruined English spelling to a similar extent to Thai and Tibetan spelling

        • Uli@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          8 hours ago

          I’m not one of the people who downvoted you. I like your passion. But maybe this is one of those things we can deal with after we’ve got a handle on climate change.

        • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Interesting. Curious – beyond the historical linguistic context, do you find yourself using ðis style because you’re deeply passionate about these language quirks, or is it also a way to make your writing stand out? Or perhaps it’s a bit of boð, or something different?

          • ÞlubbaÐubba@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            18
            ·
            7 hours ago

            I genuinely just do it because I find writing ðis way fun, and þink ð letters should make a comeback (along wið a host of oðer orþographic reforms viewable in my profile).

            Not like I’m going out of my way to force oðers to use ðem ðough, so ð sheer vitriol I’ve caught for it has honestly made me double down over ð belief ðat people so devoted to ð status quo as to become enraged over a goddamned letter should spend ðeir lives mad about it until all ðat wasted anger kills ðem.

            • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              7 hours ago

              Are you not the one fighting to go back to the previous status quo? Are you not the one fighting change, something that language naturally goes through over time? What is your problem with change? Why do you want to make communication more difficult than it already is?

              • HomerianSymphony@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                45 minutes ago

                The only reason English abandonned the letters ð and þ is because we switched to using the French alphabet. I’m not sure I would describe that as natural change.

              • ÞlubbaÐubba@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                15
                ·
                7 hours ago

                I’m not fighting for shit but my own right to write as I please wiðout being accosted for it as if ð þorn was used to anally rape someone’s moðer.

                • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  5 hours ago

                  Speaking for Americans, we absolutely have the right to publish anything legal on any infrastructure that allows it.

                  It’s quirky, and I am pretty quirky myself. Still, I would copy and paste one or two of your sentences into some language model to be sure I fully understood you.

                  A gentle request for clarity in your communications might be appropriate if one deems it prudent. Vitriol is a little over the line - the style is certainly not offensive. To address the specific wording on your point about rights, we would probably agree freedom from criticism is not a right, though we would also agree that extreme attacks are unnecessary.

                  more blah blah

                  I have visited a couple of forums over the years whose rules included English only. Each time, the rule was for the benefit of the community. Hey, I just had an idea: text in a spoiler tag could be used to hide a little glossary, so everyone would know the modern spellings of the old-school words you used. Or, if it’s easier, simply copying the message a second time and using modern spellings would be another way to facilitate clear interpretations. Nobody is going to be struck by lightning or anything for not writing in a way that every human will immediately understand. But it does seem like this happy middle ground where you start by promoting your preferred syntax before respectfully appending a “translation” as this little olive branch of clarity.

                  We probably write in our journals for ourselves while we write on here for other community members, so taking the feedback you mention you’ve received into account is ostensibly a courtesy.

                  (not a mod, $0.02 only!)

      • ÞlubbaÐubba@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        21
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        It’s ð letter which represents ð soft ‘th’ sound ð way þ represents ð hard version. Like B and P but if we had just accepted representing boþ wið an fh for some reason.

        • ℛ𝒶𝓋ℯ𝓃
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          You’ve got þat backwards… Þorne is þe unvoiced letter, as in þem or boþ, whereas eð is þe voiced, as in faðer.

          Source: A semester of Old West Norse language class (wherein þorne and eð are used in the same way as in English).

          • HomerianSymphony@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            50 minutes ago

            Old English was never consistent about the difference between thorn (þorn) and eth (eð), and they were used interchangeably in English writing.

            (Unlike Icelandic, where þ is consistently the unvoiced sound and ð is the voiced sound.)