• metallic_z3r0@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Conversely, at most 68 million people voted for Harris. That means roughly 270 million people either didn’t vote or voted for fascists, which means they’re either so disenfranchised they couldn’t vote, are idiots, were scared for their livelihoods and lied to (meaning they’re still idiots, but at least they’re also cowardly), or are fascists themselves.

    I don’t know when we’ll learn, but given our ever-deteriorating education system I don’t think it’ll be anytime soon.

      • mayooooo@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        No sense, but I’d like to see the morons who kept bullshitting that there is any kind of sense in not voting. The dumbest fucking people anywhere

          • knightly the Sneptaur
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Given the results of the election, it seems that the accelerationists might have had the right idea.

            • Thevenin@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 hours ago

              Accelerationists have never been right, their argument is self-defeating.

              The heart of the accelerationist argument is equating red and blue, claiming the blues’ inability to completely undo the damage of the reds is intentional and makes them no better – that the purpose of a system is what it does.

              But by that logic, the purpose of accelerationism is to enable fascist ascent, and that makes them indistinguishable from fascists.

              • knightly the Sneptaur
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 minutes ago

                If the purpose of a thing is what it does, then accelerationism isn’t for anything. Recognizing that things will inevitably get worse before they can get better accomplishes nothing.

            • ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              8 hours ago

              A burning building doesn’t get put out by watching it burn. And the fire can in fact spread to the next building. Things can always get worse because there is no bottom. Things will only get better by making them better.

              The accelerationists got what they wanted. And everyone, including them, are worse off for it. We’ve gone from not utilizing the limited time window, to avert the worst of climate change, to choosing to use that time to pollute as much as possible. We may in fact succeed in reaching 5°C before 2100.

            • natuhhlee@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 hours ago

              It’s likely because of them that this was the outcome. 81M votes for Biden in 2020 and 10K less this year when it really mattered?