• Raphaël A. Costeau@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I think it’s shit that some leftists continue to use Xitter. If all social media is a simulacrum of public space, Xitter is the one when this is clearer. It is not a dispute space, is literal owned by a nazi.

  • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    America is a white-supremacist country.

    I know that sounds controversial, but that’s the ideals of the president elect of the country, who won the popularity vote.

    • Chloé 🥕@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 hour ago

      the USA (and canada, and australia, and new zealand, and many more) are settler colonial states that were born out of mass genocide dictated by white supremacist rhetoric.

      these states are white supremacist to their core

  • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Yes. And no one’s going to do anything about it.

    Most people are too lazy and thoughtless to stop using it .

    The engineers that work there certainly aren’t going to stage a coup.

    And no one’s going to just do violence to Musk.

  • Lime Buzz@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    9 hours ago

    So is Mastodon really, well not a site but yeah, a lot of users there are ex 4-channers or still use it and it shows.

    Fedi isn’t really any better.

    • theshatterstone54@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      CTT claims that Bluesky is great, but I’m just not into that type of social media so while I’m on Mastodon, I don’t actually use it.

    • calm.like.a.bomb@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I don’t know what instances you roam, but I don’t see any kind of nazi/fascist shit on mine and I really love that. But then again, my instance is about metal music and people usually don’t discuss politics. Also, I’ve blocked and muted everything that relates to trump and us politics. Not that it helps anyone but me.

      • Chloé 🥕@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        the fascists of the fedi don’t roam free on the wider network, they harass in secret, usually in DMs or “followers only” posts

        there’s also a problem with subtle white supremacy, where Black people (and other POC, but mostly Black people) will get piles and piles of harassment that’s totally unrelated to being Black you see, of course, but its not happening to white people for some bizarre reason!! (see also: the many cases involving TheBadSpace where any Black person who was ever so slightly in favor of Ro and their work would get a fuckton of harassment)

        (the last one is present on pretty much all social media, be it pre-Musk Twitter, Bluesky or Tumblr, but im told that it’s especially bad on the fedi)

      • Lime Buzz@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        Thankfully all the instances we’re on block heavily but there are some well known bad actors who are white supremacists and a lot of reply guys, JAQ etc people too, I’ve seen quite a few who have slipped through the cracks before.

        Yeah, if your instances doesn’t discuss politics and you don’t follow anyone outside of music circles or at least don’t open anything with a political CW you likely won’t ever see it, but it’s there.

  • NomenCumLitteris@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    31
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Freedom of speech is good. White supremacists or any other group ideological supporters will always find a way to communicate and share their message, regardless of the century, technology, or censorship. Frankly, doing this openly on X/Twitter versus some obscure unknown forum or encrypted platforn is a positive. Social media as a whole is susceptible to ideological campaigns from groups and other countries, not just X/Twitter.

    • oxjox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      You are so fucking wrong. I have never understood this logic that because people are doing things out in the open that it’s a good thing. They are popularizing their ideas. More people are exposed to them when they’re out in the open. Had they been operating in some obscure forum, they would lack the advertising of their ideas to others.

      For what possible reason could this be “positive”? So that the rest of us are aware of their first amendment protected hateful ideas? What good does that do anyone? We just elected one of them to be president of the United States. Allowing hate speech to bloom out in the open tempers our reactions and slowly seeps into our minds as propaganda.

      Freedom of speech is, in the US, something that the US Constitution promises will not be restricted by Congress. It is not something any private company is required to protect. I would argue that private companies have a responsibility to its users to ban all hate speech and report substantiated threats to law enforcement.

      • NomenCumLitteris@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        For example, from a US-based perspective, a “positive” is that law enforcement agencies and the thousands of social media monitoring tools they utilize look at Twitter and other big platforms. LEO agencies have had for years the channels to monitor posts and request instantaneously from those companies supplemental information on the user or post that is being investigated. LE will be out of luck if they were attempting to immediately investigate a user on an obscure white supremacist forum hosted in Russia. That website owner and its servers would not be in jurisdiction to respond to that request.

        Also, please see my other reply 1 minute before yours regarding private companies being able to ban, suprress, etc. I agree with you that private companies can run their own ship how they please, whether in the best interests of profit or ideology.

        • oxjox@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          8 hours ago

          I see you’ve chosen to ignore the point about the influence this has on hundreds of millions of people.

    • rambling_lunatic@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Twitter is not a free platform. It actively suppresses the voices of the left and protects the far right.

      I do sincerely support free speech. I think it looks a lot more like the Fediverse than Twitter.

      • natebluehoovesA
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Additionally, fascists need these safe spaces to convince themselves that their opinions are the majority. They don’t feel emboldened to act otherwise.

      • NomenCumLitteris@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Sure, I don’t object to your statement of Twitter not being a free platform, and I did not claim it was. Conversely, other social media have been also known to suppress the right and protect the left. Social media can “lean” so to speak. They are provately operated companies after all. I value free speech nonetheless.