• Midnitte@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          14 days ago

          Do you really need me to Google for you why the Golan Heights president is likely a worse outcome for the citizens of Gaza?

          Fine, how about his commitment to arm Israel with no strings attached? No humanitarian aid, no cease fires…

          Anyone who thinks the Muslim-ban president is a good outcome for Gaza only cares about the real estate value of Gaza.

          • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            14 days ago

            how about his commitment to arm Israel with no strings attached? No humanitarian aid, no cease fires…

            Oh you mean exactly like right now?

            Anyone who thinks that orange man is an improvement is an idiot. But anyone who thinks Kamala would be better is also an idiot.

            Israel is already getting everything they could ever wish for. There is nothing that Trump could offer that they’re not already getting, including protection from the international community.

          • Linkerbaan@lemmy.mlOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            14 days ago

            Oh wow Trump put the name on the map! Israel already illegally occupied the place and Genocided Palestinians for decades, but Trump but officially recognized it!!! (ignore israeli mass annexation and murder in the West bank the last year too)

            When Netanyahu finishes ethnically cleansing Gaza under the Genocide Joe administration and starts building settlements, I will say ‘no biggie’. Who cares about those millions of Palestinians undergoing a Holocaust.

            The only thing that matters is when Donald J Trump officially moves the little border line on the American map. Because israel ethnically cleansing and annexxing the place under the Democrats is irrelevant.

      • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        14 days ago

        The AIPAC donations in the primary went to Nikki Hailey. Trump started receiving his cheques after he defeated her.

        Is he in their pocket now? Of course. But he was not their preferred pick.

      • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        15 days ago

        Why wouldn’t they? You made yourself fascists by chasing him but that doesn’t change the fact that he was there before you. Of course they prefer him. Just like the American fascist voters you failed to swing.

        Being a loser doesn’t absolve you.

    • Count Regal Inkwell
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      15 days ago

      One mostly exports the genocide to the third world

      The other wants to bring it home.

          • Sam Tamaskan
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            15 days ago

            Of course, ignore all the rhetoric of trump and is ilk so you can call the other guy racist. That certainly seals the argument

            • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              15 days ago

              Please take a step back, take a few breaths, and try to be coherent to the context you’re replying.

              If I were you I would either recant my position or be VERY offended that I was accused with merit of being a white supremacist. You singled out as a distinction that the bad things would happen here. To people like you. Fairly explicit that should mean something more than the lives that aren’t yours.

              This is definitional chauvinism.

              Wanna take another crack at replying now?

              • Sam Tamaskan
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                15 days ago

                What is there to be more coherent about? You boiled down that guy’s response to be about skin color

          • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            14 days ago

            Person A wants to kill 1 million people.

            Person B wants to kill 50 million people.

            You: “what’s a trolley?”