• JimmyJohn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    41 minutes ago

    The DNC didn’t F up anything, this is all on the peasants.

    If the peasants want a grab em by the P convicted rapist to lead them in the name of some allah alkbar god, while defecating on the meto/blacklivesmatter/etc movements, allowing the same allah akbar jesus sheep to keep on swinging a giant 20 pound sledge hammer at women’s rights, guaranteeing them to be second class citizens once again in my lifetime, while also emboldening sexists, fascists, rapists, racists, etc, ALL IN THE NAME OF SOME GOD, then by all means, F you jesus, F your G, and Yahwe Akbar you dumb F’s, you’ll get what you asked for.

    Being a white middle class male, I’m going to win/lose either way, but I was hoping at least the country would move forward if they elected Harris. Now, we’re on the interstate to be the next Iran.

  • Allonzee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I literally see voters saying the Democrats were too left leaning, jfc.

    With parties like this, painful collapse is the only way to avoid multigenerational destitution.

    There is no saving the United States as a framework. It is far too compromised, with too many methods installed to keep the people willfully ignorant and infighting as the owners suck their life forces dry for profit.

    We can limp along and pretend that isn’t the case, but climate change, aka the reality that doesn’t give a shit about our self-delusion and greed worship, will force that collapse sooner rather than later. Reality can’t be bribed, deluded, disappeared, or discredited.

    Enjoy living in delusion that a society can function in capitalist competition against itself, the ability to do so is coming to an end.

  • Ultraviolet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    “To all those growing skeptical of this party’s strategies and overall agenda, let me just say we hear you loud and clear. Rest assured we will be doing everything short of interpreting that sound into words and responding to those words in any way shape or form.”

    This is an all-timer.

  • GingerWitch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Pffft!!! If your idea of “learning” is to copy any of the fascist ideas of trump, then yes, they should NOT learn anything. Did Jews after Hitler go fascist… Oh wait.

    • MisterScruffy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      What trump does well is saying things that people want to hear. Obama was good at that as well when he first ran. That is what all good candidates do and it’s what the dems should do regardless if they learn it from trump or not

      • SquatDingloid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Maybe if the little malicious dopamine addicted patt of your brain is always overruling the part that processes reality you might say stupid shit like this thinking it isn’t stupid shit

  • CasualPenguin@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    5 hours ago

    What should they really learn? I’m sick of the blame being placed on decent people not doing enough.

    How about we blame the pieces of crap that support Trump who has too many disgusting qualities to list.

    • petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      They should learn how to win, for one.

      You know what they need more of? Bernie’s populist rhetoric. A promise that something will actually be different. Obama won on that promise, and then did nothing with it.

      15 million people don’t go missing unless your party is dead.

      And bare in mind, I’m not saying anyone should have voted 3rd party; we can’t do that without at least RCV. But something needs to reanimate the Democrats’ corpse or we will all die at the hands of the next Mussolini.

    • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      The blame still stops at the leading Democrats.

      Consider this. How could so many people vote for someone who is such a clear threat to democracy?

      Simple. Because despite everything they said, his opponents never actually treated him as a threat to democracy.

      Biden appointed a Republican to run the Department of Justice, and that Republican sat on his hands, refusing to do any investigation of Trump until he was forced to do so by House investigative committees. It took TWO YEARS before an investigation even began. This delay allowed Trump to eventually run out the clock.

      Trump should have been in chains on the day Biden took office. He should have faced trial in a military tribunal. Any attempt by SCOTUS to protect him should have been declared “a coup from the bench” and seen those justices charged as accomplices after the fact.

      THAT is how you need to handle an actual threat to democracy. Trump should have been put on trial, through whatever means necessary. Hell, ideally he should have received a capital sentence for his crimes against the republic. He betrayed his country. He is guilty of treason. The man should have hanged for his crimes.

      But that wasn’t how Biden treated it. Trump was an EPOCHAL THREAT TO DEMOCRACY, but not enough to risk angering conservative white voters in suburban Philadelphia. He was THE NEXT INCARNATION OF HITLER, but not so Hitlerian as to justify any kind of dubious legal maneuvers that a fascist like Trump would have no problem pulling off.

      Biden and co have been shouting that Trump is a threat do democracy for the better part of a decade at this point. But they never actually treated him like one. Actions speak louder than words. Democrats said Trump was a threat to democracy, but they never actually treated him like one. The Democrats, through their actions, made it clear that they didn’t think Trump was a real threat to democracy, so the voters acted accordingly.

      If Democrats were actually serious about the threat, Trump would have been tried by military tribunal, sentenced, and been locked away or put in the ground two years ago.

    • timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I mean, we can blame the DNC some. But we should definitely be blaming Trump voters and non-voters.

      The reverse side of this (that the Onion should do next) is:

      “Oh yeah. I didn’t go out and vote. Surely the 30th time in a row means the DNC will learn their lesson and then promote leftist policy like I want!”

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    7 hours ago

    TBH I’d be afraid of them learning anything with headlines telling them to blame Palestine supporters and Minorities.

  • Aceticon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    The only “The Onion” rather than “Not The Onion” part of this is the idea that they would announce it.

    • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      I’d say “The Onion” part of this is that the democratic party doesn’t need to learn any lessons because it’s doing exactly what they want to do. The people who will refuse to learn from this are the people who still put faith in them and the democratic system in general.

      Sure democrats would prefer to win but the most important thing to them is making sure that policies to the left of the republican party are never a serious threat to the donors they both share. That’s pretty obvious at this point, right?

  • m_f@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Local opinion piece:

    https://www.startribune.com/brehm-democrats-have-themselves-to-blame-for-trumps-election/601176736

    I read it because of the title, but it’s just some shithead that wants them to move further right:

    This red wave wasn’t as much about embracing Donald Trump as it was repudiating far-left progressivism.

    […], and then foisted upon us an equally unqualified and unpalatable hard left alternative.

    They are already creating the groundwork for sucking more corporate dick.

    • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Wait, there was nothing progressive about this campaign except for paying a little lip service to legalizing weed.

    • J Lou@mastodon.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      9 hours ago

      How can this be a rejection of the far left when Harris campaigned as a moderate (e.g. Cheney)? If republican voters are going to think Democrats are communist regardless of how moderate the Democrats are, maybe moderating isn’t a good strategy. If the only choice is between right-wing and lite right-wing, right-wing voters will choose the real thing. Even then, Trumpists will still call democrats communists.

      Many left polices are popular when they aren’t labelled as left

      @theonion

      • Facebones@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Thats the fun part, people consider dems “far left” because… Reasons, I guess? This country is so far right just the idea of building more housing counts as communist.

    • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      Reminds me of that joke about how there are only two races: White, and political. It’s disheartening to see folks (some here on Lemmy) confusing listening to the concerns of brown-skinned people with leftism. The Arab-Americans in Michigan, for a relevant example, are just people with a range of political opinions like the rest of us.

    • Loonesota@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Hardly surprising coming from the Star Trib these days… I knew it was bad when they refused to even endorse a candidate.

  • RangerJosie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Oh they know how to win. They just don’t want to. The policy decisions that would lock in Dem control for generations to come run counter to the goals of DNC Services Corp. Because they’re a corp.

  • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    wouldnt matter if they did learn from it if the crap trump campaigned on goes through and he becomes a “king” in this country

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    The electoral college did a great job once again. Everyone please raise your butts as they come out fucking. We want them to enjoy this moment. And let’s all look and act terrified as they penetrate us once more. Let’s trust that they will vote for the candidate they think we need next time too.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    12 hours ago

    The funniest part of this is the idea that there will be an opposition party in anything but a token way after this.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Was there a party that did not install SCOTUS justices that were so ideologically conservative that they did things like end national legal abortion and gut the ability of government regulation agencies to regulate?

        Yes there was. But that party is not coming back except as a token now because people just didn’t think stopping the rapist fascist dictator was a good enough reason to vote.

  • vordalack@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    13 hours ago

    They ran Harris thinking she would win based on her demographics. The DNC needs to learn that not everyone wants a black/LGBTQ/woman/etc candidate that just runs on their race/gender/sexuality.

    They want someone that’s competent that will campaign on policies that will make their lives better. The DNC has moved so far away from the working class that the RNC, the party of wealthy creeps, has them.

    • LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      They ran Harris because she was the only candidate they could justify shoehorning in without a primary, since she’s VP.

      Why they didn’t want to run a primary is a great question. Probably cost and time, and name recognition. Studies show that often the candidate with the most name recognition wins. There’s wasn’t enough time to tell every person in America a brand new person’s name.

      But usually VPs don’t do well when they run as president. Imo Dems are just trying to avoid another Bernie Sanders situation - a leftist with an authentic campaign and people who genuinely like them. More than anything, they gotta stop real progress in this country.

      • inv3r510n@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        9 hours ago

        They lost the general because they refused to hold a legitimate primary. This wouldn’t of happened. They haven’t run a real primary since 2008 and look at how hard Obama won in a landslide after competing in a deep field of qualified and competent candidates.

        • toddestan@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          29 minutes ago

          Even in 2008, it was obvious Clinton was the DNC’s preferred candidate and DNC still had their thumb on the scale. Despite this, Obama still managed to come out ahead. And with a base that was actually excited about their chosen candidate, they turned out to vote and Obama won.

          The only lesson the DNC learned from this is that they needed to push their thumb harder on the scales the next time around.

          • inv3r510n@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            18 minutes ago

            They learned two things: identity politics and weigh the scale down as hard as possible.

            They obsessed over identity, to their long term detriment as some of the minority identities they fawned over are shifting their support towards trump.

    • shadowfax13@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      running token candidates beholden to them is very shady but brilliant strategy by the superpacs :

      if they loose: blame it on sexism, racism bigotry to divert the attention from reforms in dnc for progressive leadership. and even if they pretend to be sad about it, the megarich elites and donors get taxcuts and endless price gouging from republicans.

      if they win: token candidate passes some token laws which gets either blocked in senate or so poorly implemented that they actually end up giving billions to megacorps for no visible benefit to people. case in point: https://www.atr.org/kamalas-broadband-bust-42-billion-996-days-zero-homes-connected/

    • LavenderDay3544@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      12 hours ago

      They had no platform other than fear mongering about Trump.

      The difference between Harris and Obama was that while Obama was biracial that wasn’t the focus of his campaign, his platform was, and he articulated it well. That’s the real lesson to take away from Obama’s success at the polls not let’s run a black person and hope we win.

      • inv3r510n@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        Obama also competed against a deep field of qualified candidates in 2008. He went into the general with momentum of a popular mandate and then won in a landslide.

        He would of done nearly as good if he was a white man.

        On the flip side, when the republicans lost with Romney in 2012 they did a whole lot of soul searching (rather than blaming the electorate and moving closer to the center to court mythical ‘moderates’ which is the ongoing failed strategy of the democrats), and in 2016 they had an extremely competitive primary where trump came out on top with a mandate as popular with the base as Obama in 2008.

        • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          rather than … moving closer to the center to court mythical ‘moderate

          Looking back at 2016 I think Trump won exactly because he went for the middle: middle working class. I know we all thought he was going hard right (and he did appeal to them for certain reasons), but he campaigned to the middle class and won them.

        • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Primaries also benefit from the same effect that makes every movie and TV show a reboot: Name recognition. The long primary cycle keeps their name in the news so people get familiar with it so they’re more likely to vote for them.

    • keegomatic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      12 hours ago

      They ran Harris because she was the only viable option when it was clear that Biden was not. They did not run Harris thinking she would win at all, they ran her out of desperation because the incumbent was flatlining. It was not a choice, and it certainly was not one based on demographics. It was a “Hail Mary” and it failed as it was likely to do from the outset, and everyone who was paying attention knew that, yet had no choice but to hope for the best.

      • Rutty@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        lol, you believe this? I don’t find it hard to believe that they put Biden though a primary, just to have him drop out…

        IMO running Harris was the plan from the beginning. You know, which was kind of the problem, hijacking the primary.

        • keegomatic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          28 minutes ago

          lol, you believe this?

          Do I believe that about four months ago the Democratic Party made a desperate move to replace the incumbent candidate and there were very few viable options at the time? Yes, I believe that, because we just went through it about four months ago. It’s pretty much political suicide to withdraw an incumbent candidate. You don’t plan that from the beginning, because that would be a stupid plan. It was very likely “planned” as in “plan B,” but it’s kind of idiotic to think that it was plan A. The primary was not hijacked, the incumbent is always the candidate. Primaries are always a formality for the incumbent party.

        • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 hours ago

          To use your own words, you believe that?

          This was not a grand conspiracy geez. Biden’s “primary” was perfunctory because we learned you never primary the incumbent. If he didn’t perform badly at the debate he probably wouldn’t have dropped out.

      • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        So every racist and misogynist will say she did anyways.

        Including the ones on Lemmy.

        I think she, and to a greater extent the policies of the Democratic Party since Carter just cost America the Republic but there is literally nothing a black woman could do to convince some people she’s competent in her own right.

        Competent at neoliberal corporate cronyism, mind you. But Harris’s qualifications by herself are rock solid.

    • Freefall@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      She quite specifically DIDNT run on those things, like Hillary did…so…