Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful youā€™ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cutā€™nā€™paste it into its own post ā€” thereā€™s no quota for posting and the bar really isnā€™t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many ā€œesotericā€ right wing freaks, but thereā€™s no appropriate sneer-space for them. Iā€™m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged ā€œculture criticsā€ who write about everything but understand nothing. Iā€™m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. Theyā€™re inescapable at this point, yet I donā€™t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldnā€™t be surgeons because they didnā€™t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I canā€™t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

Last weekā€™s thread

(Semi-obligatory thanks to @dgerard for starting this)

    • swlabr@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      Ā·
      edit-2
      55 minutes ago

      Ah you see, the moment you entered the realm of numbers and estimates, youā€™ve lost! I activate my trap card: 怌Bayesian Reasoning怍 to Explain Away those numbers. This lets me draw the怌Domain Expert怍 card from my deck, which I place in the epistemic status position, which boosts my confidence by 2000 IQ points!

    • Sailor Sega Saturn@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      Ā·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      Trolley Problem Meme - 34 shrimp vs 1 human

      Not that Iā€™m a super fan of the fact that shrimp have to die for my pasta, but it feels weird that they just pulled a 3% number out of a hat, as if morals could be wrapped up in a box with a bow tied around it so you donā€™t have to do any thinking beyond 1500Ɨ0.03Ɨ1 dollars means I should donate to this guys shrimp startup instead of the food bank!

      • bitofhope@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        Ā·
        58 minutes ago

        Shrimp cocktail counts as vegetarian if there are fewer that 17 prawns in it, since it rounds down to zero souls.

    • Soyweiser@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      Ā·
      6 hours ago

      Apologies for focusing on just one sentence of this article, but I feel like itā€™s crucial to the overall argument:

      ā€¦ if [shrimp] suffer only 3% as intensely as we do ā€¦

      Does this proposition make sense? Itā€™s not obvious to me that we can assign percentage values to suffering, or compare it to human suffering, or treat the values in a linear fashion.

      It reminds me of that vaguely absurd thought experiment where you compare one person undergoing a lifetime of intense torture vs billions upon billions of humans getting a fleck of dust in their eyes. I just cannot square choosing the former with my conscience. Maybe Iā€™m too unimaginative to comprehend so many billions of bits of dust.

      lol hahah.