Those non-violent protests shook them so bad they wanted to charge non-violent Quaker protestors with terrorism.

    • ochi_chernye@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 minutes ago

      Old underpantsweevil’s hinges are certainly quite wobbly, but in this particular comment they’re simply providing some historical context for the 9/11 attacks. I don’t know how fair it is to describe the NA regime as brutal, relative to Afghanistan’s current and former governments, but that’s a pretty minor quibble.

      They’ve stopped short of claiming that the attacks were justified, and the assertions made are broadly true. What in particular do you find objectionable, if I may ask?