Summary

Elon Musk’s threats to fund primary challengers to Democrats in safe districts, following his role in nearly forcing a government shutdown, have reignited calls for campaign finance reform.

Musk, who spent $277 million backing Republicans, criticized a bipartisan spending bill and used his platform to sway GOP opposition, influencing legislative outcomes.

His intervention has sparked outrage among Democrats, with leaders like Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez warning of rising oligarchy and calling for reforms to limit super PAC and dark money influence.

The episode highlights growing concerns over Musk’s political power and its impact on democracy.

  • orgrinrt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I always thought the billionaire supervillain with campy punchlines and so annoyingly obvious and mask-off manipulation, threatenings and other evil goings-on was a dumb, unrealistic and improbable trope

    But here we are

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I’d love to see Bernie’s idea of taxing anything over 999 million at 100% get implemented. I bet most Americans would actually be for this.

    You can get by on 999 million.

    • HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      It’s a whole can of worms no one in the financial sector wants to tax unrealized gains like you’re imagining tho. I like the idea in general.

  • crystalmerchant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    15 hours ago

    This is what you get when you define corporations as people and define money as speech. (Citizens United) The monkeys are running the zoo

  • Scubus@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    10 hours ago

    new urgency

    Anyone who had their minds changed over this can eat shit. If you have to be personally effected to realise something is wrong you need to [removed]

  • ceenote@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Elon is sure acting like he feels like a god lately. Hopefully it doesn’t all blow up in his face because he’s a bumbling dumbshit or anything…

    • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Because he sadly is. He has more money and wealth than God.

      What’s really sad is just how fucking cheap it is for him to buy candidates.

    • DontRedditMyLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Trump and Musk are both ego maniacs. They will have a falling out, just a matter of when and how salty they will be publicly. Fingers crossed for full on social nuclear war!

    • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      15 hours ago

      America reforming its corporate dictatorship is about as likely as it reforming the British Empire or Confederacy.

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Fat fucking chance it passes under Republican Majority, but if they do somehow get Citizens United overturned then I’m willing to forgive them.

  • makeshiftreaper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    17 hours ago

    “Hey I know just made more money than the Roman empire was worth by manipulating politics but ummmmm… could you please make rules that stop you from beating everyone else?”

    The time to stop this was in 2016. Democrats had every opportunity and continued to fellate their corporate overlords instead of even paying lip service to their base. We’re in the “find out” phase. I’m sorry you’re losing your job, but guess what, it only gets worse from here

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      Citizens United decision was in 2010, and after 2011 they lost the votes needed ever since, so probably more like 2010/2011 was the only time they had enough power to do anything about it.

      To be clear, a law banned PACs in 2002 but the courts decided that banning the pacs violated the first ammendment, meaning that simply passing a new law wouldn’t cut it. You would need either a constitutional amendment, replacing the courts, or some other measure involving a supermajority.

  • rayyy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    15 hours ago

    So he could finance a “Democrat” who will promise to switch parties after they win?

  • PhAzE@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Better hurry up. They have less than 4 weeks to change things. Soooo, it’s likely already too late.

  • drdiddlybadger
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I’m not sure how he could primary a Democrat unless he convinced people in that district to switch registration.

    • quixotic120@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      Pretty simple, he funds a “moderate” (read: right leaning basically republican who will obstruct regularly) democrat who will play the game for money, will say the right thing, play the role, and openly lie. Even if the funding is traced back to him a great deal of voters don’t pay all that much attention to nuance, they pay attention to headlines

      So watch out for a bunch of democrat challengers with a shocking amount of funding following the fetterman playbook: initially appears as an “Everyman” with unclear politics (unless you dig), maybe says some promising sounding stuff about income disparity, cops being too much, the climate, or whatever’s the hot topic at the moment during the election, wears a hoodie! Then gets elected, has a fairly uneventful year, then starts to shift hard right when they need them to.

      It has a huge chance of being successful, it’s worked many times. And when it works again what the fuck are you going to do about it? The incumbent has an inherent advantage once installed because people don’t pay attention, recall elections basically never ever happen, there is no accountability for them whatsoever so they will do whatever they want

      He doesn’t need people to switch registrations. He just needs the currently registered voters to continue to be mostly low informed and the help of the media to keep them that way

      • Pips@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Didn’t Fetterman’s views change after a major medical incident? It really just seems like he had an actual personality change after having a stroke.

        • MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          13 hours ago

          This. He had a long history of being exactly who he said he was in local politics, which led to real grassroots support. He hasn’t been the same since. Whether it was medical or financial, he’s no longer that person.