Edit: I also just got banned for apparently being a troll. Me. Not the person they believe to be a dragon though.

  • PugJesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    7 days ago

    rare PugJesus L. everyone making this a shitshow had every opportunity to block this user, just as every other person we are annoyed with, but for some reason, no, we have to all be vocal about it.

    If it was drag themselves, that would be one thing. I don’t even remember the last time I interacted with, or read, drag’s posts. It’s the admin reaction which soured me.

    • spujb@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      7 days ago

      which reaction? clearly stating that a rule would be enforced strictly before enforcing it strictly?

      come on, man, you’re better than this lmao

      • PugJesus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        7 days ago

        The reaction mandating the legitimization of someone all-but-identifying as an attack helicopter. This is the sort of thing that if I saw in a satire of online trans spaces, I would have rejected as an excessively absurd exaggeration even for mean-spirited satire.

        I suppose I thought too highly of people.

          • PugJesus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            7 days ago

            I would say that, in all fairness, that could be read not as an endorsement of the idea of attack helicopter as a gender itself, but as a defense of it in reclamation/shibboleth/slang term, the way that some queer folk playfully call themselves ‘faeries’ despite the history of the term, without meaning to imply that they are literally the fae folk of yore.

            … but her actions regarding drag do not inspire confidence in that interpretation.