Since the only vague summaries are being widely reported and the details are going to matter to many people here, this is where the full text of yesterday’s executive order redefining gender and sex may be found.

Warning: It is worded to be cruel and dehumanizing. If you feel you need to read it, have loved ones and self care prepared to support you.

  • ChihuahuaOfDoom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    15 hours ago

    2 days in and I’m ready to move out of my house since I live with my MAGA mother-in-law, she defends shit like this while my daughter and another of her grandkids are transitioning, I’m through.

    • Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Just remind her, according to Trump, we’re all NB now…since none of us could make either large or small reproductive cells at conception.

  • Boomkop3@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    That was milder than I expected.

    TLDR: it makes clear the distinction between sex and gender, and wants official operations, including assignments of “intimate” spaces to be based on sex, not gender.

    His argument for this is that men have been attacking women by using their gender identity to access women’s spaces. The extent of the issue was not mentioned.

    My take: why not just remove gender and sex from official operations entirely? With some nuance, only your doctor should care.

    • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      8 hours ago

      it makes clear the distinction between sex and gender, and wants official operations, including assignments of “intimate” spaces to be based on sex, not gender.

      That’s not mild. That’s going to kill people

    • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      10 hours ago

      It gags me that they pretend to justify this as “defense of women” when we all know how little they care about the lives and safety of women. Also I guess now transmen will be expected to use the Ladies Room, I’m sure the pearl-clutchers will be delighted with that. And the transwomen should feel incredibly safe using the Men’s Room.

      🎵 Cis men, men, men are the problem cis men…" 🎵

    • earphone843@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      15 hours ago

      It’s a bullshit reason. A rapist isn’t going to say, “Welp, I’m not legally allowed in there, so no rape for me today.”

      • Boomkop3@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Ah dang, public bathrooms are the #1 choice for that! It’s the bad hygiene and high risk of getting caught of course

      • Boomkop3@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        No it does not, it doesn’t even go into that issue. Assault will still be assault and the law should be enforced as such.

        • Nat (she/they)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          If they believe that, why do they bother with the bathroom segregation? Why not just treat all cases of assault the same and ignore the segregation? (I would like this)

          • Boomkop3@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            The bathroom segregation here is go prevent endangering women. But he does not mention how to handle assault in these places or whether that should be different for each gender.