• Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 days ago

    At first I thought they had it rigged so that both bows apply force to the arrow. But on closer inspection I see that is not the case, which seems a lost opportunity. @PugJesus, do you think the image is accurate, or did the artist miss a key point?

    • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Ah, I dug into this once for a reenactment/recreation build once!

      What they do is loop the string around the front bow, and attach it to the rear bow. So instead of just pulling back, you pull both bows towards eachother, meaning you get (theoretically) double the power per centimeter of draw length. You can even do this with double “front” and “reverse” bows, looping multiple times, creating a long pull length with multiple short limbs.

      Note that this DOES NOT work like this with the bowstring just wrapped around the wooden bow limbs as shown here. You absolutely need pulleys to make this work on anything you can use without a ratchet (or modern nylon low-friction bowstrings, and it’s still not great).

    • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      Interestingly enough, I believe both bows do apply force to the arrow. Chinese siege crossbows sometimes sport a similar setup. The fiber connection allows it to bend back with more force with both prods.