Summary

The Republican Senate passed a $340 billion budget blueprint aimed at funding President Trump’s priorities, including $175 billion for border enforcement and $150 billion for military expansion, following an extended vote.

The resolution, adopted 52-48, directs committees to identify spending cuts to offset new funding.

It faces debate over its fiscal impact and amendments addressing cuts to Medicaid and tax policies.

The measure now pressures the GOP House to reconcile differences or adopt a fallback plan.

  • Boddhisatva@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Budget bills are not subject to filibuster. There’s not a lot they can do to stop this.

    From Budget Reconciliation Explainer

    Executive Summary

    In the 119th Congress, Republicans might use reconciliation to push through their policy goals.

    What is “reconciliation”?

    Reconciliation is a tool – a special process – that makes legislation easier to pass in the Senate.

    How is it different from a regular bill?

    Instead of needing 60 votes, a reconciliation bill only needs a simple majority in the Senate.

    People really need to stop blaming the Democrats for not stopping the Republicans for doing evil shit. When an axe-wielding maniac starts killing college co-eds, do you blame the maniac or do you blame the little old lady across the street for not stopping the maniac with her knitting needles. And yes, the Dems are for the most part a bunch of useless little, old ladies because that’s who got elected. Don’t like it? Get more people to vote in the primaries for more pols like AOC and Bernie Sanders. Assuming we ever have any more elections.

    • Skydancer
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      Not subject to filibuster per se, but there was absolutely something they could have done. From TFA:

      Under the process, Senate rules allow for members to propose an unlimited number of amendments.

      So while not literally a filibuster, they could have effectively filibustered it by simply continuing to propose amendments, preventing the bill itself from ever coming to a vote. Once again, the Democrats are showing themselves unwilling to play hardball.

      • Boddhisatva@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Yes, knitting needles. We should still be blaming the maniac rather than bitching that the little old lady didn’t do enough.