I’m currently on Win11 but I’m getting that familiar Linux itch and want to dual boot a while again. I tend to gravitate towards Ubuntu simply because it’s so big and well supported by most things.

I’ve run Arch in the past but I’ve gotten too old and lazy for that if I’d be completely honest. I have played with manjaro and endeavour though… and opensuse tumbleweed, rolling is kind of nice.

Not sure what I’d try out first this time so I figured I’d get some inspiration from you guys!

  • jakepi@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    I would take a look at pop_os. It’s Ubuntu, but without Snap and a closer to mainline kernel version. They have a lot of great usability tweaks too.

    I run Arch BTW. I just like to make things difficult :)

    • nlm@beehaw.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I installed Kubuntu… I couldn’t be assed to resize my efi partition to a gig and disrupt windows… Done that in the past with varying results. Wish they didn’t require it to be that big tbh.

      I do miss Arch… wouldn’t surprise me if I’ll install it again soon.

      Kubuntu works. But where’s the fun in that? :)

      It’s like… I installed it, messed with lutris a bit (needed a newer version) and installed Diablo 4, everything works… and now I feel like I’m missing out somehow. :)

      • jakepi@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re missing out on chasing the dragon for the latest and greatest. :)

        Arch is fine once you get it setup, but I feel like the nerd in us can never just leave it be. I’ll probably go back to pop_os next major release they have.

      • ladydascalie@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Wayland. I’ve had no issues, but then I don’t play CS:GO. However I’ve played Cyberpunk on ultra with no issues, for example.

      • Communist@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Make sure you’re running the sdl environment variable that makes them native on Wayland, in my experience when that’s on it makes my games that are native significantly more performant.

    • nlm@beehaw.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think I just might have to give pop a go and see what all the fuss is about. :)

  • Bright5park@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have been quite happy with Arch Linux, up until I got my Steam Deck, at which point I stopped playing on my non-Deck PCs, so… SteamOS, I suppose.

      • Bright5park@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        It is, but I still count it as it’s own thing, in the same way most people count Debian and Ubuntu as two seperate distributions.

        • Communist@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes, you’re correct, just a little funny that you moved from arch to basically steamarch, or as I’ve recently taken to calling it, arch plus steam

    • Jim P.@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Came here to say SteamOS as well. I am surprised more people aren’t saying it. But the thing is, the Steam Deck works so well I have to wonder how many people don’t know/care the OS it runs, or maybe they have forgotten it’s running Linux, or maybe they know but don’t consider themselves “Linux Gamers” just because they are using it.

      Sort of like how people playing on a Switch or PS3/4/Vita are technically FreeBSD gamers deep down.

  • brotherballan@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve been running Linux Mint for a few years now and it’s been really good for me. Runs games through Steam and Lutris about as good as I’ve had it.

    I’ve also run other distros like Pop! and Fedora here and there but they seem to give me more issues.

  • Nyanix@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve been on Manjaro for 3 years, honestly love it, it’s treated me great for gaming and given me so little to have to fix that my wife has also been running it for 2 years.

  • Mr_Vortex@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m currently running Nobara and I really vibe with the Gnome desktop and Fedora in general. However, I recently installed Linux Mint for my girlfriend’s gaming rig and I was surprised by how lightweight and responsive it felt. It was also dead simple to use during the entire setup process and I can absolutely see how you’d never need to enter a terminal if you didn’t want to. If I ever have a reason to leave Nobara, I’m definitely going to go with Mint!

  • lertsenem@mastodon.lertsenem.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    I weirdly did not see anyone mentioning SteamOS? Formerly based on Ubuntu, now based on Arch, I believe.

    It’s the distribution that the #SteamDeck is packaged with, and so it’s become my main gaming distrib now. :]

    • nlm@beehaw.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Are they providing the arch based version for download now? I was under the impression they’ve only set it up for steam decks but not for general use?

        • nlm@beehaw.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, thought so. Hope they’ll publish their newer versions as well soon.

      • lertsenem@mastodon.lertsenem.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        @nlm You’re right, but there is an unofficial version (with some tweaks to work on standards PC) available here.

        It works as intended, but I would only recommend it if you intend to use your PC in a console-like setup (ie, plugged to a big screen, with a game controller).

        • jakepi@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I tried HoloISO and had pretty mixed results. I’ve had much better luck with ChimeraOS.

          The devs on ChimeraOS are excellent too, they take in community feedback and are very helpful.

        • nlm@beehaw.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ah cool!

          Not something I’d use now then but still neat that you can get it :)

  • milo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    As a former Arch user, Fedora has been so amazing for me. It’s so rock solid and simple to use. It also has great software compatibility because lots of software is distributed as rpm due to businesses using CentOS and RHEL.

    • Zetaphor@zemmy.cc
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Came here to say exactly this. I’ve hopped distros for years, Fedora is the longest I’ve stuck to a single distro and it’s been fantastic.

  • Thorned_Rose@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I use Arch with KDE. I’ve been daily driving Arch coming up a decade now and despite testing various other distros on laptops over the years, I haven’t seen anything yet to tempt me away. I heart Pacman.

    Personally I find most of the laziness factor with Arch is a non issue once you get installation done. My previous install was 6 years old and the only reason I reinstalled was because I got a new PC.

    That said if an installer is a must-have then I would recommend Endeavour OS or Manjaro for best of both worlds.

    • nlm@beehaw.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      True, it’s not that hard to get going either I suppose. Isn’t there a bunch of manual configuration after updates though? I have a faint memory of pacman telling me stuff that needed fixing after each update?

      Last time I played around with Arth i tried their archinstall script I think it was. Pretty neat cli installer that worked rather well.

      Endeavour is nice as well…

      Gah, you guys are making me want to spin up a whole bunch of distros :D

  • 20gramsWrench@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    garuda, it’s just a fancy arch install with the ugliest, bloatiest, default theming you can imagine, but once you get rid of it it’s pretty solid.

    • nlm@beehaw.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re really selling it :D

      …I looked it up. You’re correct. That… was flashy.

      • TrontheTechie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve been using Garuda as well. It’s solid, and I like the fact they have a gaming variant that takes a lot of the nitpick presetup out of the picture.

    • nlm@beehaw.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Tumbleweed’s always treated me very nice, you ought to try it out!

      Kind of makes me wish I opted for that right now… It’s always given me a very polished feeling!

  • DaveedMee@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I use Arch with KDE Plasma for that comfy desktop environment feel but switch to BSPWM ever so often for productivity or to use my pc as just a media center