• DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Isolating a fascist power with the strongest military in the world doesn’t work. Eventually they work up the balls to use it.

    Every nation should be prepared for what happens when the purge of the US military and government is complete and only loyalists hold power.

    • slickgoat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 days ago

      Given that there are no ideal moves in any direction, I feel that standing up to the bully is the only option on the table. They failed to do that in 1939.

    • slickgoat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      And another thing. Its America’s job to police this mess, they installed him either directly or indirectly. The rest of the world didn’t ask or vote for this dangerous toddler.

      • freebee@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        No joke, I can see UK and France offering nuclear retaliation response promise to Canada, outside of NATO. I think trump really is dumb enough to start real war with for example Canada. NATO is dead, rest of the west needs to make similar protection agreements without USA, besides NATO , for when shit really hits the fan (I think it will, it’s a matter of when, not if).

          • Pringles@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            From article 5 from the NATO treaty actually. It states that it applies to attacks from external actors, i.e. non-members.

            Edit: the article or nato treaty doesn’t state it that explicitly actually. But a quick google show that it’s at least the consensus interpretation

            • itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              It has been hotly debated, mostly in regards to Greece and Türkiye, who have been at each other’s throats for decades. In that case, the aggressor likely wouldn’t be obvious and both are likely to claim article 5. Their relations to other NATO members are also a lot more ambiguous, some favoring one, some the other.

              In the case of a rogue USA attacking Canada, or Denmark, I believe the case would be a lot clearer.

            • Alpha71@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              it states that it applies to attacks from external actors, i.e. non-members

              Which America would be if they leave NATO…