• finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    5 days ago

    Sounds par for the course in the USA.

    People are literally surprised when somebody reads out actual policy which was signed into law and who voted for it.

    • RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      5 days ago

      Because our entire election cycle isn’t spent on policy, but character attacks.

      To be fair, there’s plenty of material to attack, so I guess they get distracted.

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        5 days ago

        Yeah I blame the citizens over the candidates at this point. Everybody should be educated on what they’re voting for, not whom.

        • jaaake@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          Agreed that everybody SHOULD be educated. It’s definitely POSSIBLE to become informed, but holy fuck man, it shouldn’t take this much effort.

          Blaming the citizens is insane. If you think that a large enough percentage of the voting population is capable of even FINDING digestible unbiased information… I don’t know what to tell you. I’m more informed than the general public and I didn’t even have a reliable source. I want something that doesn’t just explain the contents of every piece of legislation, but also the impact, knock-on effects, and true underlying motivation. Getting a full picture that I trust involves cobbling together multiple sources and attempting to filter out biases and conspiracy theories.

          Who has that kind of time? Most of us out here are trying to keep our head above water and not spiral into unrecoverable debt. There are centuries of people in power molding their constituents into complacency through systemic oppression to ensure this is the case. The average person has a government sponsored education and is religious. They’ve been indoctrinated with a pledge of allegiance and a set of values that everyone around them seems to follow. Few folks have the disposable income or the desire to travel outside their bubble of comfort and develop empathy for someone unlike them. People who are informed know that the root cause is capitalism, which has been peaking in the last few decades with lobbyists and citizens united. The average person wants to ignore politics, if they do vote, they vote like the people in their community. For them, a vote isn’t something that’s done to better the country, it’s something that prevents them from being ostracized.

          • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            Congress has every bill ever introduced and its current status, every roll call, all of the contents of it all, etc listed online for all to see.

            Wikipedia has summaries of every major political event in the last 3 centuries in great detail and citations to their sources documented.

            Finding information is as easy as taking a simple look. Literally everybody can be educated about medical care, citizens united, immigration statistics, election fraud statistics, etc. They’re not trying.

            • frostysauce@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              5 days ago

              Oh, yeah, let me just read entire fucking hundreds or thousands of pages long pieces of legislation in my free time so that I may be an informed voter… smh

              • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                5 days ago

                You just need to look at a few important ones. Hypothetically, a rural american might be incredibly distressed by Republican economic and healthcare policy. An urban third party voter might be flabbergasted that the things they fight for all these years were actually core DNC platforms constantly called to vote and filibustered by the GOP. Etc.

                • frostysauce@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  5 days ago

                  You’re ignoring the issue. You said Congress has every bill including the contents online as if that somehow lowers the barrier for engagement. Do you think people are willing or even able to read and understand pieces of legislation hundreds or thousands of pages long written in indecipherable legalese? Let alone “a few important ones?”

        • RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          5 days ago

          It’s a problem that was fixable 40 years ago. I think it’s too late. We’re too stupid and too drama thirsty to care about boring things such as public policy.

          Anyway, I hear Jane Kardashian has a new bracelet! Did you see it?

    • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      5 days ago

      Because they “didn’t vote for that”. They voted for lesser evil, which includes bombing Yemen for a decade. The spoiler effect is obvious to fellow voters, but incomprehensively arcane to lawyers.

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        God I fucking wish we voted for the lesser evil.

        For the record, in 2014 Yemen began a civil war and the Obama administration backed the GCC intervention into Yemen, fighting against the Houthi revolutionaries, in 2015 alongside the UN Security Council issuing an Arms Embargo on the Houthis. The US support was logistical and intelligence. This has unfortunately continued to this day, although the previous Biden Administration did publicly announce a withdrawal of that support, but continues sale of armaments to Saudi Arabia who leads the GCC due to condemnation of their strikes on civilians. (The Houthis also strike civilians, mind you).

        TBH I think maybe a more forceful approach, a direct intervention to establish a governance complete with minimal casualties and to provide welfare, to the situation at the end of Obama’s term or the start of the Trump term might have been better than just pussyfooting around and letting Saudi’s commit the warcrimes instead. Either that or doing nothing at all and allowing them to kill each other all on their lonesome so as to keep our own hands clean.

        Another thing I’m not taking into account with this retelling is the whole proxy-war angle wherein Houthis and Saudis gaining support from various outside influences impacts their own allegiances in economic policy and that by not participating it would leave a gap for another world power to establish a different governance in the region that explicitly supports said world power. The whole region is an important economic position for oil and gas as well as shipping between Europe and Asia.

        • RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          Specifically the war stats when The Houthi Militia pulls out of a coalition government and attacks the capital.

          The Houthi Militia are not the innocents in this war. They started it.

          • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            Also, the Houthis are being armed by Iran who is financially supported by China in exchange for oil, and I hate China so that’s another negative in my book.