• Mustakrakish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 day ago

    Housing shouldn’t be an investment asset, especially in a for profit system, or you’ll just make BlackRock again.

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      I think that’s what s/he was trying to resolve with the doubling of tax on each additional property. It would become cost prohibitive very quickly to have multiple properties.

      • TronBronson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        You would have to close the endless amounts of tax deductions on real estate to make it matter. If they can write off the loss as a business cost than the portfolio will just eat the tax and pass it on to the renters.

    • TronBronson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      It shouldn’t be an investment asset.

      Homebuilding is still a business though. You still need someone to risk their money, assemble the materials and crew, complete the project and find a buyer for it.

      If there’s no demand for a product no one will build it. There’s always going to be demand for a mythical product that can’t be built. Like cheap housing.

      I just spent $2,000 on a handful of wood, shingles, and siding to patch my house up. like 1/10th of a single wide trailer. That’s just the materials i’ll be providing the labor which would normally cost $30-$60 hour.

      So it shouldn’t be an investment asset, someone still has to invest in it being built, so that a homeowner may live there.